This analysis focused exclusively on the case study of “Nestlé and Child Labor in The Cocoa Supply Chain” published in the textbook. The analysis reveals that at the heart of the cocoa industry, there are major ethical challenges in terms of child labor and exploitation that are more pronounced within the company’s supply chain. Profit maximization and operational efficiency Nestlé and Cargill put economic gains first at the expense of humane considerations. Systemic change is shown to be possible, but the facts at hand show that these companies are either unwilling or unable to adopt these changes. The challenges that ensue include economic dependence on cocoa cultivation in poor West African countries and the convoluted network of forces that control the cocoa global supply chain. Regulatory frameworks and international initiatives that have been created to curb these labor abuses have hardly enforced their mandates, thus allowing these corporations to escape accountability and continue reaping profits. There is, therefore, a need for a multi-pronged approach involving not only systemic factors but also individual factors to address the prevailing exploitation. Ethical sourcing of labor, in particular, would have to consider higher levels of transparency and accountability in corporate supply chains. There is also the need to strengthen regulatory frameworks that should hold these corporations accountable for the labor violations they commit. Consumers and civil society should also focus on advancing worker welfare, ensuring that labor is sourced without exercising bad faith against communities, and promoting human dignity and social responsibility. A holistic approach must deal with the root causes of labor exploitation. It must also establish a system where stakeholders adopt the culture of ethical business. The goal must always be to create a more sustainable and equitable environment crowned by the rights and dignity of every individual partaking in its construction.
The “Nestlé and Child Labor in The Cocoa Supply Chain” focuses on child labor. With the increased demand for cocoa products and globalization of its market, Nestlé and Cargill are accused of exploitation of the commodity, which has led children into labor. The legal fight of more than 15 years had Nestlé defending itself fiercely against these accusations. The company alleged that it had taken an initiative in setting up measures such as codes of conduct for its contractors and it had also invested in its management systems. However, the plaintiffs argued that these arrangements were scanty to address a system that perpetually sought to use child labor in the cocoa supply chain. The matter was taken before the U.S. Supreme Court, which primarily sought to answer the question of liability under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS).
The key actors, in addition to Nestlé and Cargill, were the plaintiffs who were former child laborers and their representatives under the alias names “John Doe I – VI.” Tony’s Chocolonely also represented the sustainable chocolate movement, advocating for ethical sourcing practices and fair treatment of cocoa farmers. These groups filed a complaint in the district court against defendants Nestlé USA and Cargill. Advocacy groups and NGOs also presented submissions to the Court to explain the complexity of curbing human rights abuses and atrocity crimes committed by these transnational corporations. In a historic decision, the U.S. The Supreme Court agreed with Nestlé and Cargill following the hearing of their arguments, stating that “alleged conduct such as general corporate activity, corporate social responsibility, and the like” were too attenuated to form jurisdiction under the ATS. This recognition of the underlying gravity of the suit based on the reasoning of the Court has been put into question as it pointed out many difficulties of establishing jurisdiction like lack of statutory limitation against which corporations can be sued for abuses in foreign countries.
The case revealed that the cocoa market, largely driven by world multinationals known as “Big Chocolate,” faces systemic challenges among poverty, lack of access to education, and unstable cocoa prices, which drive the demand for child labor. The regulatory measures for monitoring the issue of child labor vary from voluntary efforts such as the Harkin-Engel Protocol to due diligence laws. These may not work effectively in the absence of general strategies to address the basic socio-economic driving forces of exploitation in the supply chain.
Behind the legalistic labyrinth arises moral issues concerning business responsibility and human rights against the economic interests in play. Even though companies such as Nestlé and Cargill have given pledges to fight against child labor, criticism is still being made that serious efforts have to be undertaken to eliminate the practices that provide cheap labor in the cocoa field. On the contrary, there are wider issues with respect to who checks the multinational corporations to ensure that ethical practice is upheld throughout their supply chains.
A large number of problems, temptations, dilemmas, and issues arise. The ethical dilemma is the issue of child labor in third-world countries of West Africa. Many vulnerable children are exposed to hazardous working conditions in the production of cocoa in these areas. In addition, another major issue presented by this case is the difficulty of enforcing private lawsuits to address human rights abuses committed by business entities operating abroad. Moreover, there is the systemic problem of delinking child labor to poverty and lack of education access, which points to the precariousness of trying to resolve such issues.
These ethical violations are deeply harmful in various ways. First, children who are forced into labor are primary victims and undergo the physical, psychological, and emotional trauma that arises from dangerous work environment conditions, exploitation, and abuse (Luckstead et al., 2019). Their fundamental rights in regard to education, safety, and welfare are perennially violated, thus ensuring that the poverty trap and vulnerability become self-perpetuating (Busquet et al., 2021). Secondly, child labor is injurious to the social network of communal and domestic practices that underpin life in the areas where cocoa is produced (Berlan, 2013). It weakens crucial human resource capacity, disturbs knowledge generation and learning, and further engenders instability stemming from persistent economic reliance (Berlan, 2013). More so, when consumers seek goods that have been produced at the cost of child labor, they end up sustaining or underwriting child activities, which many firms put first ahead of human rights (Luckstead et al., 2019). Cumulatively, the continued acceptance of child labor in the cocoa market only goes on to compound the evidential injustice done to society and erodes the moral standing that societies should work so hard to maintain for ages.
The confluence of both individual and systemic motivating factors is the foundation upon which ethically questionable behaviors in the cocoa industry lie. One source of such temptation is insufficient controls and surveillance relating to the intricate global supply chain (Kissi & Herzig, 2023). The inefficiency in surveillance arises because a gigantic production network, including suppliers and intermediaries, presents great challenges for Nestlé and Cargill to monitor and enforce standards from an ethical standpoint effectively. This fact makes it more likely that exploitative practices are hidden to maintain low costs and a high profit margin. In addition, the huge profitability of the cocoa business creates competitive pressure and the necessary market conditions that incite corporations to ignore labor abuses in their aggressive pursuit of economic gain.
Another issue is the fact that these corporate entities are distanced from directly engaging with child labor victims. Such distancing may lead to moral disengagement, where decision-makers within corporations placate their consciences or justify various misdemeanors by discounting their personal stake or involvement (Cartier, 2022). This is further strengthened by the fact that cocoa farming increasingly takes place in complex and remote regions that give a feeling of detachment. These facts make it easier for corporate actors to leave unresolved the causes of child labor while they continue making profits.
The ethically questionable behaviors that are prevalent within the cocoa industry are largely motivated by a combination of both economic incentives and competitive pressures, respectively, as well as priorities as established by the organization (De Leth & Ros-Tonen, 2021). For example, cost-efficiency and profit have come off as central motivators to the cocoa companies within the multinationals. In an ever more aggressively competitive market where profit margins are slim, and prices of commodities vary, many might play the game in order to reduce the costs of production, including labor. With this line of thinking, in cases where there is exploitation of labor that reduces the cost of production, such a way of thinking will lead to tendencies of overlooking or ignoring ethical concerns at the expense of returns in an economy.
Secondly, these corporations are also driven by the high level of supply chain demands and strict production quotas. The consequence of such pressures is that within very stringent deadlines, a blind eye is turned to fulfill market demands. Taken together, this combination of economic imperatives, competitive dynamics, and organizational incentives is instrumental to creating an environment where ethically compromised behaviors are rationalized and justified within the context of corporate decision-making.
In light of the ethically suspect backdrop, some several groups and individuals have their interests well served by a continuation of the status quo. First on the list are Nestlé and Cargill, who benefit from the status quo given that it allows them to sustain their competitive advantages and profitability in the world marketplace (De Leth & Ros-Tonen, 2021). The second is the corrupt officials in the cocoa-producing counties and at the helm of the legal and ethical teams of these multinationals. Both the government of Ivory Coast and the legal teams at Nestle and Cargill know what child labor and low-wage practices are. However, they ignore it and term it a way of life for survival amid extensive poverty and a lack of other means to make a living. Third on the list are the farmers. Most farmers also use the system of low wages and low standards of labor in cocoa regions to reduce their production costs, increase their profit margins, and stay afloat in the industry. These practices further keep these farmers competitive in the larger global market, where their produce continues to be demanded without incurring further expenses associated with labor compliance. Thus, however ethically evil, the current situation in the cocoa industry, in so many ways, serves to undergird the economic interests and the necessities of life of a few groups and vested individuals within the continuum.
Integral to any given situation is an overall rubric of benefits, which in this case are monetary (to the companies and farmers) and the assumed efficiency that allows competitive advantage (for the companies). The benefits systems motivate both from the perspectives of direct rewards that are doled out and those that are intimated to provide for an implicit adherence to ethically questionable actions and, in reality, help to encourage a level of behavior that works towards profits. These beneficiaries continuously reward themselves by allowing labor abuses to flourish unchecked, thus leading to lower production costs and higher profits for their multinational corporations. Formal rewards such as market dominance and competitive advantages work to perpetuate the stands of corporations within the industry. Non-financial rewards of decreased regulatory attention and reputation protection further isolate these companies from legal impacts and negative public perceptions about their actions, effectively allowing the business to carry on as before.
Different environmental, organizational, and contextual aspects of the cocoa industry fuel the perpetuation of ethically questionable activities. For example, heavy reliance on the production of raw materials in regions with low-income levels and situated in West Africa causes an environmental factor that supports the practice of exploitative child labor (Ayensah, 2019). This fact has left the culture of cocoa farming as the only hope for these regions. Such vulnerability in terms of economics incentivizes the very use of cheap labor, like child labor, available at hand to minimize production costs.
Contextually, corporate cultures are driven by financial performance metrics and demands of shareholders; it is, at best, self-evident that executives and decision-makers would have an orientation towards short-term economic gains rather than long-term sustainability and social responsibility. Unfortunately, this is what many see as resulting in labor abuse for little purpose other than that it ends up being acceptable in the end or tacitly ignored for the purpose of differentiating and creating a further level of competitive edge within the marketplace. Global corporate supply chains in industries like cocoa are memorable, complex, and opaque. An opaqueness results in the so-called “diffusion of responsibility” from top corporations to distance themselves from labor practices at the lower levels of their supply chain. They create oversight and accountability means within their corporation that are not transparent, and this, in turn, perpetuates the behavior without facing results.
The case of Nestlé USA and Cargill underlines one more powerful reminder of the quite complicated equilibrium between the frameworks established by law, ethical obligations, and economic reasoning in relation to dealing with child labor in the cocoa industry. Rather than being seen as a limitation of the law upon which it is based, the Supreme Court’s decision illuminates the continued significance of stakeholders’ long-term efforts and struggles to push real change that will protect weak individuals along global supply chains.
Ayensah, N. (2019). The Ethical (Or Not So Ethical) Story Behind Your Bar Of Chocolate: The Untold Tale Of A Distressed Ghanaian Farmer. https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/ethicscontest/17/
Berlan, A. (2013). Social Sustainability in Agriculture: An anthropological perspective on child labor in cocoa production in Ghana. Journal of Development Studies, 49(8), 1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.780041
Busquet, M., Bosma, N., & Hummels, H. (2021). A multidimensional perspective on child labor in the value chain: The case of the cocoa value chain in West Africa. World Development, 146, 105601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105601
Cartier, C. (2022). Nestlé vs. Dow and the Humanitarian Slavery Crisis in the Cocoa Industry. Journal of International Business and Law, 21(2), 4. https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl/vol21/iss2/4
De Leth, D. O., & Ros-Tonen, M. (2021). Creating shared value through an inclusive development lens: A case study of a CSV strategy in Ghana’s cocoa sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(2), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04808-1
Kissi, E. A., & Herzig, C. (2023). Labor relations and working conditions of workers on smallholder cocoa farms in Ghana. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10470-2
Luckstead, J., Tsiboe, F., & Nalley, L. L. (2019). Estimating the economic incentives necessary for eliminating child labor in Ghanaian cocoa production. PLOS ONE, 14(6), e0217230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217230