Social Media Role in Promoting Patient Care
Social media utilization for both health and personal usage is on the increase. It incorporates social networking sites ranging from Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn, and blogs, among other platforms. Social media plays a vast and crucial role in serving patients. For instance, it enhances their autonomy by complementing the information given by the healthcare professional and offering psychosocial support. In addition, social media usage by the patient can help healthcare professionals give patient-centered care through virtual sharing. According to DeBronkart’s (2014) Ted Talk, social media offers patients a platform to interact in real-time around various health-related topics. The patient group has greatly benefited from social media use for health purposes. According to Chen &Wang (2021), about 67% of all internet consumers in the United States use platforms of social media to consume health content. Patients can utilize social media for various purposes, such as engaging with peers for support, sharing their experiences, information networking, tracking personal progress for their health, goal setting, and patient education, among others. Hence, digital strategies, including crowdsourcing, social media, and mobile phone devices, can offer patient health information in real-time, anywhere, and in specific contexts.
Nevertheless, social media use by patients does not only provide beneficial effects. It may incorporate a challenge within the healthcare system ranging from misinformation, patient privacy concerns, and subject on ethical issues. Thus, therefore this essay will focus on the role social media utilization has on patient care by reflecting on various Ted Talks.
Patients utilize social media as a tool to share medical information online. Today, social media are offering a platform to discuss medical conditions remotely. According to Heywood (2014), most patients and their families establish interactive communication online where they share information concerning their medical conditions, symptoms, and recommended treatments which help offer education and encourage patient empowerment. The patients tend to share their medical information by establishing forums encouraging discussions and knowledge discovery on various conditions. Drawing from the TedTalk titled “The big idea my brother inspired,” Heywood has developed a website called PatientsLikeMe, which contains 45000 patients with various health problems. Heywood utilizes the website by sharing the story and health experience of his brother, who succumbed to ALS. The interactive forum fosters patients to share their medical data in real-time, such as symptoms, treatments, experiences, and other recommendations, encouraging other patients and improving their wellbeing. When patients learn that other individuals are suffering from the same ailments, they tend to have lower anxiety levels, and their overall health improves. Therefore, the multiple social media platforms utilization in health is mainly for accessing education and resources by patients and providers.
Social media also provides a platform for patients requesting medical advice, feedback, and reports on personal experiences from individuals with similar illnesses. According to Giustini et al. (2018 there have been increased support initiatives online that assist patients in seeking social support, consolation, and connectivity with the rest, which improves patients’ empowerment and awareness. Research depicts that over 1 million members with breast cancer exist in a Facebook group where they help with social support. Numerous patient group says that social media is a powerful tool for patients with cancer, weight management, and depression, among other conditions. Drawing the Ted Talk titled “Meet e-Patient Dave” summarizes the need for the patient to seek answers online, seek peer support and utilize the recommended healthy practice to improve their health and wellbeing by utilizing their medical data. DeBronkart offers a brief history of his kidney cancer and how the doctor concluded that he would only live for 24 weeks. This prompted him to seek information online from credible sources on the prognosis of kidney tumors and available cures. Unfortunately, no cure was found for the disease. His daughter helped in the search for help in an online community that deals with cancer patients. She found helpful help that would be effective in improving his lifespan through the use of a particular medication. Through that information, his lifespan improved as the tumors’ levels kept decreasing drastically.
Furthermore, DeBronkart (2014) emphasizes the need for healthcare professionals to provide data information to patients. Patients using this medical data can seek vast information from the e-patients and better information that would save their life. Dave gives an example of a particular woman whose husband succumbed to kidney cancer. To help advocate for other kidney patients, she paints a picture of an individual and writes down some basic data about the patient since she argues if doctors provide data of what the patients might e-patient, they could use that data to their advantage, which would save lives through patient sharing information in e-patients lab. Dave also stresses the need for software engineers to develop a full body scan in 3d that would help patients do a thorough body check to determine any abnormalities that would make them seek medical attention on time. Therefore, using e-patient online sharing platforms can assist patients in getting better alternatives to medication and practices, improving their wellbeing and quality of life.
Social media aids patients in seeking online medication care, which improves patient-centered care. Patient empowerment has greatly influenced patients to seek quality care. According to Dishman (2013), nowadays, patients use social media to communicate their condition with the doctor virtually, seeking online consultation and seeking advice, and health information. Drawing from the insights from Ted Talk titled “Healthcare should be a team support”, Dishman stresses the importance of reinventing the healthcare system through disruptive innovations. Dishman offers an example of how online medication and diagnostics have helped him improve his quality of life. He says that when he was first diagnosed with kidney problems, doctors gave him a living schedule of three years at maximum. However, when he decided to take control of his life, he was able to seek online care and accurate diagnostics using innovative scanning devices. He argues that traditional healthcare is founded on traditional diagnostic frameworks involving passive patients, diagnosis assumptions, and incorrect medication and treatment plans. He stresses the need for current healthcare that involves care anywhere, care networking, and care customization. Dishman (2013) advocates for care anywhere, which means a patient does not necessarily need to be taken to a hospital clinic for diagnosis and patient, but the use of technological devices and hand-held devices such as mobile phones with ultrasound scanning apps may serve the purpose of the diagnostic accurately and in real-time. This would reduce bacterial infections that one may contract in a hospital clinic setup and transmit to others, which necessarily implies expensive costs in seeking care, unlike when the care is given at home.
Dishman (2013) also emphasizes care networking in reducing patient medication errors. He gives an example of how one day he developed increased heart palpitations which several doctors, after checking-, ruled out to be heart problems and prescribed medication of the same treatment thrice. But upon seeking the help of an online doctor, the physician determined that Dishman had no heart problems, but the palpitations were due to a case of an overdose. He, therefore, argues that if the healthcare system were reinvented in such a way that care networking would be available through the coordination of caregivers, many patients would not receive wrong diagnoses and medications, ultimately improving their wellbeing and health. This kind of care would also include social care, which encompasses even care provided by family members. Care customization is another essential thing in reinventing the healthcare system. Traditional healthcare depends on guesswork in diagnosis and treatment since the clinical trials performed on a population fail to target a specific patient but represent diverse patient needs. Dishman argues that through technology such as AI, data mining, and data analytics, the diagnosis and invention of medicine will target individual patients depending on their specific needs, thus improving care customization. For instance, the technological use of genome sequencing helps offer a computerized diagnosis and correct medication for a specific patient’s illnesses. Social media can increase innovations through the recruitment of clinical trials and research collaboration. Therefore, with the unveiling of multiple healthcare technologies, it is worthwhile for all individuals to save the lives of one another.
Lastly, social media utilization can serve as a tool for social mobilization. Social mobilization of available online resources, especially AEDs for cardiac arrest patients, can help improve emergency cases. According to Rumsfeld et al. (2021), crowdsourcing, social media, and mobile phone applications can play a significant role in resource social mobilization as they give information in real-time, personalized geography, and specific location with specific location relevant health content. Drawing from the Ted Talk titled “Crowdsource your health,” Engelen (2014) emphasizes the need to crowdsource in the healthcare system. Crowdsourcing helps engage a wide array of the population in network connectivity in emergencies and increases understanding of health conditions, especially in cardiac arrest patients. Mobile devices can help improve emergency care, such as providing support in terms of patient education and crisis communication in emergency medical events. Engelen (2014) poses a sample of quizzes on where one can find AEDs to save a life, but the audience needs to learn. He, therefore, continues to elaborate on how crowdsourcing of information through the use of a website and an iPad application for augmented reality helped locate the nearest available AEDS within the Netherlands that could help in saving lives. Therefore, more innovations in mobile applications utilize AEDs registry data to locate AEDs that are near the bystanders or new ones through augmented reality.
Nevertheless, social media increased usage by patients in seeking answers, sharing information, sharing experiences, and peer-to-peer support has brought several challenges. One challenge patients experience is misinformation. Patients, when using social media platforms for purposes of health, may encounter misleading information about their health conditions (Rumsfeld et al., 2021). Since the internet is accessible to everyone and anybody can post any information on various health topics, patients may consume misleading content from individuals who may pose as professional healthcare. Unqualified individuals can give out false information on a certain illness which may have a different perspective and vary based on culture and location. Therefore, false information may affect the patient’s well-being and can lead to adverse patient outcomes. The other challenge is concern about patient privacy. Several patients may hesitate to share their personal stories, experiences, and medical data for fear of confidentiality. Drawing insights from the Ted Talk titled “Let’s pool our medical data,” Wilbanks raises a concern about patient privacy regarding the use of patient data in research hypothesis anonymously. Wilbanks (2014) wonders why a patient is urged to sign informed consent to protect the patient’s privacy. However, the same content can be found on the online platform and in research cases, meaning patient privacy is violated. He, therefore, argues that patients need to be empowered with accurate and updated information about their health to make fully informed treatment decisions, as their autonomy should be valued. Therefore, patients need to be educated on how the internet works in adhering to social media HIPAA guidelines to protect their consent and medical information.
Social media utilization for purposes of health or personal usage has increased since its emergence. Patients can now use social media platforms to interact, share experiences and stories, seek support, and educate one another on health conditions. Patients and families with specific health issues can get and offer information content that supports those with similar conditions, such as learning about others’ symptoms, diagnoses, and medication. This helps in creating patient empowerment that has positive overall benefits in improving health and quality of life. The use of mobile phones, crowdsourcing, and social media are among the disruptive innovations modernizing the healthcare system for improved patient-centered care outcomes. However, the challenge of misinformation and patient privacy is not exceptional in the use of social media. Patients are educated on the responsible usage of social media for better outcomes. Therefore, social media helps patients engage in patient interaction, patient empowerment, and social support, among other benefits that improve their overall care.
Chen Junhan & Wang Juan. (2021). Social media use for health purposes: Systematic review. PubMed Central (PMC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156131/
DeBronkart Dave. (2014). Meet e-Patient Dave. TED: Ideas Worth Spreading. https://www.ted.com/talks/dave_debronkart_meet_e_patient_dave
Dishman Eric. (2013). Health care should be a team sport. TED: Ideas Worth Spreading. https://www.ted.com/talks/eric_dishman_health_care_should_be_a_team_sport
Engelen Lucien, L. (2014). Crowdsource your health. TED: Ideas Worth Spreading. https://www.ted.com/talks/lucien_engelen_crowdsource_your_health
Giustini Dean et al. (2018). Effective uses of social media in public health and medicine: A systematic review of systematic reviews. PubMed Central (PMC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194097/
Heywood Jamie. (n.d.). The Big Idea My Brother Inspired. TED: Ideas Worth Spreading. https://www.ted.com/talks/jamie_heywood_the_big_idea_my_brother_inspired
Rumsfeld John et al. (2021). Use of Mobile Devices, Social Media, and Crowdsourcing as Digital Strategies to Improve Emergency Cardiovascular Care. AHA Journals. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000428
Wilbanks John. (2012). Let’s pool our medical data. TED: Ideas Worth Spreading. https://www.ted.com/talks/john_wilbanks_let_s_pool_our_medical_data
The Role of Nurse Leadership in Maintaining Quality of Care, and Factors Impacting on Care Quality
The role of the nurse leader is crucial in sustaining and contributing to the quality of care in healthcare settings. According to Moran et al. (2023, p.7), nurse leaders play a critical role in ensuring that patient care is safe, effective, and efficient by establishing and maintaining high standards of practice and providing guidance and support to their staff. Effective nurse leadership can significantly impact the quality of care provided to patients. Good leaders can inspire and motivate their team members, promote a culture of continuous improvement, and ensure that all staff members are held accountable for providing high-quality care (Moran et al., 2023, p.10). They can also foster a culture of open communication and collaboration among team members, leading to better patient outcomes. On the other hand, ineffective nurse leadership can have negative consequences on the quality of care provided. Poor leaders can undermine staff morale, fail to provide adequate guidance and support, and contribute to a culture of blame and mistrust. Younas and Quennell. (2019, p.540) say this can lead to staff burnout, high turnover rates, and ultimately, compromise the quality of care provided to patients. Effective leadership can significantly impact the quality of care provided, while ineffective leadership can compromise the quality of care and lead to negative consequences (Younas and Quennell., 2019, p.542). This paper will discuss the role of the nurse leader in sustaining and contributing to the quality of care, including the potential impact on care quality of effective or ineffective leadership, identify and critically explore approaches to managing risk within healthcare, and evaluate the potential wider impacts of organizational influence, politics, policy, or economics on quality of care and health outcomes.
The Role of Nurse Leadership
Nurse leaders play a critical role in sustaining and contributing to the quality of care in healthcare settings. According to Wakibi et al. (2021, p.135), they are responsible for ensuring that the highest level of care is provided to patients by guiding and supporting the nursing staff in their daily activities. Effective leadership in nursing has been linked to better patient outcomes, increased job satisfaction among nurses, and improved organizational performance (Wakibi et al., 2021, p.138).
There are many ways in which nurse leaders can contribute to and sustain the quality of care:
Establishing and Maintaining Standards
Nurse leaders should work with other healthcare professionals to establish and maintain standards of care for patients. Smith (2019, p.21) says they should ensure that all staff members are aware of the standards and are trained to adhere to them. Nurse leaders play a critical role in establishing and maintaining standards of care that ensure high-quality patient outcomes. Standards of care are established guidelines defining the expected performance and quality level for healthcare providers, including nurses. Nurse leaders can contribute to and sustain the quality of care by establishing and maintaining standards by developing policies and procedures, monitoring performance, implementing quality improvement initiatives, providing education and training, and collaborating with other healthcare providers (Smith 2019, p.24).
Encouraging Evidence-Based Practice
Nurse leaders should encourage their staff to use evidence-based practices to provide the best possible care for their patients. According to Butts and Rich (2021, p.14), this means staying up-to-date on the latest research and guidelines and promoting the use of best practices in patient care. Nurse leaders play a critical role in ensuring the delivery of high-quality patient care. One way they can contribute to and sustain the quality of care is by encouraging evidence-based practice (EBP) among their nursing staff. EBP involves using the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide nursing care and decision-making (Butts and Rich 2021, p.17).
Nurse leaders can encourage and sustain evidence-based practice by promoting a culture of inquiry. They can encourage nurses to ask questions and seek out the best available evidence to guide their practice. Heinen et al. (2019, p.2378) argue that this can be done by fostering a culture of inquiry, where nurses are encouraged to ask questions, challenge assumptions, and seek out the best available evidence.
Consequently, they can provide education and training. Nurse leaders can provide education and training to their nursing staff on how to find, critically appraise, and apply evidence to their practice. This can be done through workshops, in-services, or online training programs (Heinen et al., 2019, p.2382). Nurse leaders can encourage and sustain evidence-based practice by incorporating EBP into policies and procedures, supporting nursing research, and using data to drive decision-making.
Ensuring Staff Competency
Nurse Leaders should ensure that their staff members have the necessary knowledge and skills to provide high-quality care. According to Heinen et al. (2019, p.2388), this involves ongoing education and training and regular performance evaluations to identify areas where improvement is needed. Nurse leaders play a crucial role in ensuring the quality of care provided by their organization by ensuring that their staff is competent and able to provide safe and effective care (Heinen et al., 2019, p.2392). Competency is the ability of an individual to perform their job responsibilities to the required standard, and it is essential to ensure that all staff members have the necessary knowledge, skills, and attitudes to provide high-quality care.
To contribute to and sustain the quality of care by ensuring staff competency, nurse leaders can develop clear job descriptions and performance expectations. Warshawsky et al. (2019, p.249) say nurse leaders can ensure that job descriptions for each staff member are clear and specific, outlining their roles and responsibilities and the expected performance standards. Clear performance expectations help staff members to understand what is required of them and ensure they are competent in their roles. Other ways to contribute and sustain the quality of care through staff competency include providing ongoing education and training, conducting regular performance evaluations, offering mentorship and support, and encouraging a culture of continuous improvement (Warshawsky et al., 2019, p.252).
Nurse leaders should provide support and resources to their staff members to help them manage their workload and cope with the challenges of providing care. According to Hofmeyer et al. (2021, p.298), this includes offering emotional support, stress management resources, and professional growth and development opportunities. Nurse leaders play a critical role in contributing to and sustaining the quality of care by supporting their staff. Quality of care can be defined as the degree to which healthcare services meet the needs and expectations of patients and are consistent with current professional knowledge (Hofmeyer et al., 2021, p.301).
Nurse leaders can support staff to maintain and improve the quality of care by fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement (Wei et al., 2019, p.681). Nurse leaders can support staff in their ongoing learning and development by providing training and resources, encouraging participation in professional development activities, and creating opportunities for staff to collaborate and share knowledge with their colleagues. This continuous learning and improvement culture can help ensure that staff stays up-to-date with the latest research and best practices in their field, which can directly improve the quality of care provided to patients (Wei et al., 2019, p.683).
The other ways nurses can support staff to maintain and improve quality care include providing adequate staffing levels, supporting staff well-being, encouraging open communication and collaboration, and recognizing and celebrating successes (Miles et al.,2019, p.5). Overall, nurse leaders play a crucial role in contributing to and sustaining the quality of care by supporting their staff. Nurse leaders can help ensure that staff is empowered to provide their patients with the highest quality of care possible.
The impact of effective or ineffective leadership can be significant in terms of patient outcomes and staff morale. According to Miles et al. (2019, p.8), when nurse leaders are effective, they can motivate and empower their staff to provide high-quality care and improve patient outcomes. Effective leaders can also help reduce staff turnover and improve job satisfaction, leading to better patient care. On the other hand, ineffective leadership can have the opposite effect. When nurse leaders are unable to inspire their staff or provide adequate support and resources, staff members may become disengaged and demotivated (Miles et al., 2019, p.11). This can lead to reduced quality of care, increased staff turnover, and decreased patient satisfaction.
Risk management is a critical aspect of healthcare that involves identifying, assessing, and managing potential risks or adverse events that could affect patient safety, healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizations (Cummings et al., 2021, p.103). There are several approaches to managing risk within healthcare, which can be broadly classified into proactive and reactive approaches.
Proactive approaches aim to prevent or reduce the likelihood of adverse events from occurring in the first place. According to Cummings et al. (2021, p.105), these approaches include risk assessment in which healthcare organizations conduct risk assessments to identify potential risks or hazards and evaluate the likelihood and severity of adverse events. Quality improvement holds that healthcare organizations implement quality improvement initiatives to identify areas for improvement in patient care processes, reduce errors, and enhance patient safety. Staff training and education ensures that healthcare organizations provide staff with the necessary training and education to enhance their skills and knowledge, reduce errors, and improve patient safety (Liu 2019 p.73). Standardization and protocols ensure that healthcare organizations develop standardized protocols for clinical processes and procedures to ensure consistency and reduce errors.
Reactive approaches aim to manage adverse events after they occur. These approaches include incident reporting and investigation, in which healthcare organizations encourage staff to report incidents, near misses, or adverse events and conduct investigations to identify the root causes and develop strategies to prevent recurrence (Liu 2019, p.75).
Root cause analysis ensures that healthcare organizations use root cause analysis to identify the underlying causes of adverse events and develop strategies to prevent a recurrence. According to Chaimowitz et al. (2020, p.33), disclosure and apology ensure that healthcare organizations implement policies and procedures for disclosing adverse events to patients and their families, providing them with information and support, and offering apologies when appropriate. Litigation management supports healthcare organizations in managing litigation related to adverse events by working with legal counsel and insurance providers to resolve claims and implement strategies to prevent future events (Chaimowitz et al., 2020, p.36). Overall, a comprehensive risk management program in healthcare incorporates both proactive and reactive approaches to ensure patient safety and minimize the likelihood and impact of adverse events.
Risk management within healthcare refers to the process of identifying, assessing, and managing potential risks or adverse events that could affect patient safety, healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizations. Moran et al. (2023, p.11) hold that the healthcare industry is inherently complex and involves many interconnected systems and processes, which can increase the likelihood of errors, adverse events, and other risks. Risk management aims to minimize the likelihood and impact of these risks by implementing strategies to prevent or mitigate them. There are several key components involved in risk management in healthcare, such as risk identification which involves identifying potential risks or hazards that could affect patient safety or the functioning of healthcare organizations (Younas and Quennell., 2019, p.550). This can include patient care processes, medical equipment, staff training, competence risks, and organizational policies and procedures.
The other component is risk assessment. Once potential risks have been identified, they must be assessed to determine their likelihood and potential impact on patients, healthcare professionals, and the organization (Wakibi et al., 2021, p.149). This can involve evaluating the severity of potential adverse events, the frequency of occurrence, and the likelihood of detection. The component of risk mitigation holds that strategies must be developed and implemented to prevent or mitigate potential risks. This can include improving clinical processes and procedures, providing staff training and education, implementing technology and equipment to enhance patient safety, and developing policies and procedures to minimize the likelihood of adverse events (Smith 2019, p.30). The other component is monitoring and evaluation. Risk management is an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring and evaluation to ensure effective strategies and identify new risks that may emerge.
Therefore, effective risk management in healthcare is critical for ensuring patient safety, maintaining organizational performance, and minimizing the likelihood of adverse events (Butts and Rich 2021, p.24). By identifying and mitigating potential risks, healthcare organizations can improve their quality of care and enhance patient outcomes.
Risk mitigation refers to the process of identifying and implementing strategies to reduce the likelihood and impact of potential risks or adverse events (Heinen et al., 2019, p.2396). There are various approaches to risk mitigation in healthcare, including avoidance, reduction, transfer, and acceptance. Avoidance is about avoiding activities or situations that pose a significant risk. For example, a healthcare organization may decide to avoid using a particular medical device if it has a high risk of failure. Reduction involves reducing the likelihood or severity of a risk. For example, a healthcare organization may implement a training program to reduce the risk of medication errors by staff. Transfer means transferring the risk to another party. For example, a healthcare organization may purchase insurance to transfer the financial risk of a malpractice claim to an insurance provider. Acceptance involves accepting the risk and its potential impact (Warshawsky et al., 2019, p.257). For example, a healthcare organization may accept the risk of a patient developing a complication during surgery despite taking all necessary precautions.
There are also several risk mitigation tools that healthcare organizations can use to identify and manage potential risks, such as risk assessment tools, root cause analysis, clinical decision support systems, incident reporting systems, and checklists and protocols. According to Hofmeyer et al. (2021, p.310), risk assessment tools can help healthcare organizations identify potential risks and assess their likelihood and impact. Root cause analysis helps healthcare organizations identify the underlying causes of adverse events and develop strategies to prevent a recurrence. Clinical decision support systems provide healthcare professionals with real-time guidance and alerts to help prevent errors and adverse events. Incident reporting systems are systems that allow healthcare professionals to report incidents, near misses, or adverse events, which can help healthcare organizations identify potential risks and develop strategies to prevent recurrence (Wei et al., 2019, p.688). Checklists and protocols are tools that can help standardize clinical processes and procedures to ensure consistency and reduce the likelihood of errors or adverse events.
Patients/service users are the primary focus of risk management in healthcare. Miles et al. (2019, p.15) say risk management decisions that affect patients can significantly impact their safety and well-being. For example, decisions related to medication management or infection control can directly impact patient outcomes. When evaluating the potential impact of risk management decisions on patients, healthcare organizations must consider their potential benefits and harms and ensure that they prioritize patient safety (Cummings et al., 2021, p.110).
Risk management decisions can also have an impact on individual staff members. For example, decisions about staffing levels or workload can affect staff stress and burnout, ultimately impacting patient care (Liu 2019, p.80). When evaluating the potential impact of risk management decisions on individual staff members, healthcare organizations must consider the potential effects on staff morale, well-being, and job satisfaction.
Risk management decisions can also impact healthcare teams as a whole. For example, decisions related to communication or team structure can impact team dynamics and collaboration, which can ultimately impact patient care (Chaimowitz et al., 2020, p.40). When evaluating the potential impact of risk management decisions on teams, healthcare organizations must consider the potential effects on team performance, morale, and effectiveness.
Risk management decisions in healthcare can significantly impact the healthcare institution as a whole, including its financial performance, reputation, and ability to provide high-quality care. According to Moran et al. (2023, p.15), the potential impact of risk management decisions on the healthcare institution must be evaluated to ensure that decisions are made with the institution’s long-term interests in mind. On financial performance risk, management decisions can impact the financial performance of the healthcare institution. When evaluating the potential impact of risk management decisions on the healthcare institution’s financial performance, healthcare organizations must consider the potential costs and benefits of these decisions and ensure that they prioritize the institution’s financial sustainability (Liu 2019, p.85).
Risk management decisions can also impact the healthcare institution’s reputation. For example, patient safety or quality of care decisions can impact the institution’s reputation among patients, stakeholders, and regulatory bodies (Liu 2019, p.90). When evaluating the potential impact of risk management decisions on the healthcare institution’s reputation, healthcare organizations must consider the potential effects on patient trust, stakeholder confidence, and regulatory compliance.
Staff numbers/skill mix should be considered because risk management decisions can also impact the healthcare institution’s staffing levels and skill mix. For example, staff recruitment or training decisions can impact the institution’s ability to provide high-quality care (Chaimowitz et al., 2020, p.44). When evaluating the potential impact of risk management decisions on the healthcare institution’s staffing levels and skill mix, healthcare organizations must consider the potential effects on staff morale, productivity, and performance.
Hence, the potential impact of risk management decisions on patients/service users, individual staff, and teams must be carefully evaluated to ensure that decisions are made with their interests in mind. Healthcare organizations must prioritize patient safety and well-being while also considering the potential impact on staff and teams (Chaimowitz et al., 2020, p.49). Effective risk management in healthcare requires a proactive and collaborative approach that involves all stakeholders in decision-making processes.
The potential wider impacts of organizational influence, politics, policy, or economics on quality of care and health outcomes in healthcare are significant. According to Bambra et al. (2019, p.36), these factors can influence the delivery of healthcare services and affect the quality of care that patients receive and their health outcomes. On organizational influence, the culture, leadership, and management of healthcare organizations can significantly impact the quality of care and health outcomes. For example, an organization with a strong culture of safety and quality may be more likely to prioritize patient safety and implement effective risk management practices (Bambra et al., 2019, p.38). Conversely, an organization with a culture that prioritizes financial performance over the quality of care may be more likely to cut corners and compromise patient safety.
Political factors can also impact the quality of care and healthcare outcomes (McCartney et al., 2019, p.e1). For example, changes in healthcare policies or regulations can impact the availability and accessibility of healthcare services, which can affect patient outcomes. Political factors can also influence the allocation of healthcare resources, which can impact patients’ quality of care. Healthcare policies can significantly impact the quality of care and health outcomes. For example, policies prioritizing value-based and patient-centered care may improve patient outcomes (McCartney et al.,2019, p.e4). Conversely, policies that prioritise cost containment over the quality of care may lead to compromised patient outcomes.
Economic factors can also impact the quality of care and healthcare outcomes (Wranik et al., 2019, p.550). For example, changes in healthcare funding or reimbursement models can impact the financial incentives for healthcare providers, which can affect the quality of care that patients receive. Economic factors can also influence the availability and accessibility of healthcare services, which can affect patient outcomes. As such, the potential wider impacts of organizational influence, politics, policy, or economics on quality of care and health outcomes in healthcare are significant. Healthcare organizations must consider these factors when making decisions that impact patients’ quality of care (Wranik et al., 2019, p.554).
Nurse leadership plays a critical role in maintaining the quality of care in healthcare organizations. As frontline caregivers, nurses are responsible for delivering safe and effective care to patients while creating and sustaining the conditions necessary for high-quality care delivery. Effective nurse leadership involves creating a culture of safety, promoting teamwork and collaboration, fostering continuous learning and improvement, and advocating for patient-centered care. Nurse leaders must also prioritize staff development and empowerment, providing support, feedback, and recognition to encourage excellence in nursing practice. However, several factors can impact the quality of care and can be a challenge to nurse leaders. These include staffing levels, workload, and skill mix issues, which can lead to burnout and compromise patient safety. Other factors that impact care quality include financial constraints, limited resources, and system-level challenges such as inefficiencies in care delivery processes. To maintain quality care, nurse leaders must work collaboratively with other healthcare professionals, policymakers, and regulatory bodies to identify and address these challenges. Nurse leaders must also prioritize data collection and analysis to identify improvement areas and measure the impact of quality improvement initiatives. Therefore, nurse leadership is essential for maintaining the quality of care in healthcare organizations. Effective nurse leaders must create a culture of safety, promote collaboration and continuous learning, and prioritize staff development and empowerment. However, nurse leaders must also address the challenges related to staffing, workload, and resources to ensure that patients receive safe and effective care.
Bambra, C., Smith, K.E. and Pearce, J., 2019. Scaling up: the politics of health and place. Social Science & Medicine, 232, pp.36-42.
Butts, J.B. and Rich, K.L., 2021. Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chaimowitz, G.A., Mamak, M., Moulden, H.M., Furimsky, I. and Olagunju, A.T., 2020. Implementation of risk assessment tools in psychiatric services. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 40(1), pp.33-43.
Cummings, G.G., Lee, S., Tate, K., Penconek, T., Micaroni, S.P., Paananen, T. and Chatterjee, G.E., 2021. The essentials of nursing leadership: A systematic review of factors and educational interventions influencing nursing leadership. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 115, p.103842.
Heinen, M., van Oostveen, C., Peters, J., Vermeulen, H. and Huis, A., 2019. An integrative review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice. Journal of advanced nursing, 75(11), pp.2378-2392.
Hofmeyer, A. and Taylor, R., 2021. Strategies and resources for nurse leaders to use to lead with empathy and prudence so they understand and address sources of anxiety among nurses practising in the era of COVID‐19. Journal of clinical nursing, 30(1-2), pp.298-305.
Liu, H.C., 2019. Improved FMEA methods for proactive healthcare risk analysis (pp. 73-96). Singapore: Springer.
McCartney, G., Hearty, W., Arnot, J., Popham, F., Cumbers, A. and McMaster, R., 2019. Impact of political economy on population health: a systematic review of reviews. American journal of public health, 109(6), pp.e1-e12.
Moran, K.J., Burson, R. and Conrad, D., 2023. The doctor of nursing practice project: A framework for success. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Miles, J.M. and Scott, E.S., 2019. A new leadership development model for nursing education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 35(1), pp.5-11.
Smith, M.C., 2019. Nursing theories and nursing practice. FA Davis.
Wakibi, S., Ferguson, L., Berry, L., Leidl, D. and Belton, S., 2021. Teaching evidence-based nursing practice: A systematic review and convergent qualitative synthesis. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(1), pp.135-148.
Warshawsky, N. and Cramer, E., 2019. Describing nurse manager role preparation and competency: findings from a national study. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(5), pp.249-255.
Wei, H., Roberts, P., Strickler, J. and Corbett, R.W., 2019. Nurse leaders’ strategies to foster nurse resilience. Journal of nursing management, 27(4), pp.681-687.
Wranik, W.D., Price, S., Haydt, S.M., Edwards, J., Hatfield, K., Weir, J. and Doria, N., 2019. Implications of interprofessional primary care team characteristics for health services and patient health outcomes: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Health Policy, 123(6), pp.550-563