Since more people perform their daily activities online and via digital technology, cybercrime has grown in prominence recently. Governments worldwide are now enacting cybersecurity legislation to stop cybercrimes from happening. This research paper examines how international cyber security rules affect cybercrimes and suggests how international law might be modified to solve these challenges.
This study explores how international cyber security rules and the current judicial system affect cybercrimes. This study evaluates worldwide cyber security law to prevent crimes and identify areas for improvement (Khan et al., 2022, p. 971). This study analyzes literature and case studies to assess international cyber security rules and worldwide cybercrime. This paper will propose ways to improve international cyber security rules and fight cybercrime.
A few associations team up with the public authority to battle cybercrime. This study will utilize the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Centre (UNCCT), an expert division of the UN accused of fighting psychological oppressor assaults and other worldwide perils like cybercrime. In collaboration with public legislatures, worldwide associations, and different accomplices, the UNCCT forms and sets in motion the intent to counter psychological oppression and other transnational dangers. The UN Show on Cybercrime (UNCCT) empowers global collaboration in making network safety norms. Furthermore, it advances the use of appropriate global network protection regulations. UNCCT works on the legal structure for fighting cybercrime through its drives and organizations and cultivates worldwide coordinated efforts in handling network protection issues (Montasari, 2023). The gathering supports correspondence and participation among partners, including states, everyday society, and the confidential area, to improve worldwide digital protection.
Exploring the impacts of worldwide digital protection guidelines on cybercrime and how global regulation may be modified to address these hardships is proper, given the UNCCT’s order of “forestalling and battling transnational perils.” By assessing the UNCCT’s job in advancing worldwide collaboration in cybercrime counteraction and supporting network safety, this study can assist us with a better comprehension of the viability of global network safety regulation in fighting cybercrime on an overall level (Lubis & Handayani, 2022, 151-161).
International cyber security regulations aim to deter and prosecute online criminal activity. These laws specify what counts as cybercrime and set forth punishments for individuals who do so (Sharma & Kaur, 2019, n.p). Additionally, they offer a framework for international collaboration in catching and punishing cyber criminals. The possibility of cybercriminals being apprehended and punished is one of the significant effects of international cybersecurity regulations (Litvinenko, 2020, 1521-1541). These rules make it possible for law enforcement authorities to cooperate internationally in investigating and prosecuting cybercrimes. Because many cybercrimes are committed by actors based abroad, this is very significant. Cybercrimes can ruin reputations, steal sensitive data, and cost money (Argaw et al., 2020, 1-10). Global cybersecurity laws compensate victims. International cybersecurity laws have reduced cybercrimes. These guidelines help prevent cybercrime globally by deterring perpetrators, increasing the likelihood of their capture and punishment, and protecting victims.
Another advantage of these regulations is that they deter individuals who engage in illegal activities online (also known as the “chilling effect”). Certain people are deterred from engaging in criminal behavior online since there is always the possibility that they will be discovered and brought to justice for their actions. This may be of assistance in bringing the total number of cybercrimes committed down to a more reasonable level (Kagita et al., 2022, 83-98).
Personal cybercrime begins. Computer crimes target one person. Cybercrime includes hacking email accounts, sending spam, and spying on webcams.
Property cybercrime. Cybercrime targets victims’ phones, computers, and other devices: Ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, and identity theft.
Government cybercrime follows—online crimes target federal, state, and municipal governments. Government cybercrime includes installing malicious software on government networks to steal or damage data, stealing federally unlawful government information like tax returns, and denial-of-service attacks on government websites like the IRS (Sen et al., 2022, 1931-1938).
AI-powered cybercrime involves AI-using cybercriminals. These attacks could cause cyberattacks or identity theft (Kaloudi & Li, 2020, 1-34).
AI-powered malware, data poisoning, and phishing.
Harmful software is computer vandalism. Crashing systems, stealing data, and corrupting files.
Malware and viruses cause computer crimes (Ponde, 2022, n.p).
Copyright infringement is stealing or distributing copyrighted materials. File-sharing websites infringe copyright the most (Aronov, 2021, n.p). Illegal BitTorrent downloads of music and movies are copyright infringement cybercrimes.
Cross-site scripting hackers inject malware into websites (XSS). This code steals website users’ credentials. British Airlines’ 2018 data breach exposed 380,000 bookings and thousands of customers’ data (Williams et al., 2022, n.p).
Cyber harassment is another common cybercrime. Technology is used to stress someone out intentionally. Sending harassing sexual or violent texts or emails can (Mohsin, 2021, n.p). Threatening texts and leaking photos are cyber harassment. Cyberbullying is common.
Cybersquatting is impersonating someone else on a similar website or domain name. Stealing a name or business name to get passwords and usernames is common.
Cyberstalking involves unwanted contact or online stalking.
Cyberterrorism uses the internet to commit violent and destructive acts that spread fear and panic. Cyberterrorism involves hacking government databases to cause power outages (Jacobsen, 2022, 62-72).
DoS cyberattacks disable websites and other online services. Repetitive website requests slow or crash it. A person or botnet bombards a website in a denial-of-service cyberattack (Badotra & Sundas, 2021, 1-19).
Human trafficking and hacking child pornography to recruit victims are illegal. A 29-year-old Mexican national was sentenced to 25 years in West Palm Beach federal court for child sexual exploitation.
Hackers launch drive-by cyberattacks without the victim’s knowledge after gaining access to a computer system or website.
Cyberattack eavesdropping involves online monitoring. Cyberattacks use keyloggers and other spyware to eavesdrop on online conversations.
Insider cyberattacks can damage or steal a company’s computer system and other resources.
Malware harms users. Adware, spyware, and worms are malware. Unlike theft or fraud, malware damages computer systems and data (Katagiri, 2021, n.p).
Online libel or slander involves defaming someone. Alfalo sued Weiner for Florida defamation per se and intentional emotional distress (Solo, 2019, 75-77). Falsely slandering someone on social media causes emotional distress.
There are advantages to having international cyber security regulations, yet there may likewise be downsides (Halder & Jaishankar, 2019, n.p). One drawback is the need for more proficient authorization instruments. A few nations need to improve on labor supply and skills to explore and indict instances of cybercrime appropriately. It is additionally conceivable that only one out of every odd nation will cooperate to tackle the issue of cybercrime (Ali et al., 2021, 248-255).
International cyber security rules may need to be revised to keep up with the rapid advancement of technology, which is another drawback (Habibzadeh et al., 2019, n.p). As technology develops, new varieties of cybercrime appear. Keeping up with these changes might take much work for international cybersecurity laws.
Some recommendations to strengthen international cyber security regulations are explorable. Cybercrime investigation and punishment could benefit from improved global coordination and cooperation. Thus, nations may be required to establish multinational task forces to coordinate cyber security measures and data exchange (Taeihagh & Lim, 2019, 103-128).
Another suggestion is to make the enforcement processes stronger. This might entail giving law enforcement organizations more resources and training and toughening the penalties for cybercrime. Finally, it is critical to keep up with the rapid advancement of technology (Farahbod et al., 2022, 63-71). As they appear, international cyber security laws may need to be updated frequently to address brand-new cybercrimes.
International cyber security laws prevent and punish cybercrimes. These laws may catch and punish cybercriminals and deter cybercrime (Smith et al., 2019, 42-60). These restrictions are limited by a need for more enforcement and the inability to keep up with technological innovation. Propos, including boosting international collaboration and coordination, strengthening enforcement, and keeping up with technology, might be considered to increase international cyber security legislation.
Al Ali, N. A. R., Chebotareva, A. A., & Chebotarev, V. E. (2021). Cyber security in marine transport: opportunities and legal challenges. Pomorstvo, 35(2), 248-255.
Argaw, S. T., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J. R., Lacey, D., Florin, M. V., Calcavecchia, F., Anderson, D., … & Flahault, A. (2020). Cybersecurity of Hospitals: discussing the challenges and working towards mitigating the risks. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 20, 1-10.
Aronov, A. (2021). Copyright protection in the Internet age: Whether copyright can combat Peer-to-peer technology.
Badotra, S., & Sundas, A. (2021). A systematic review on the security of E-commerce systems. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 18(2), 1-19.
Farahbod, K., Shayo, C., & Varzandeh, J. (2020). Cybersecurity indices and annual cybercrime loss and economic impacts. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 32(1), 63-71.
Habibzadeh, H., Nussbaum, B. H., Anjomshoa, F., Kantarci, B., & Soyata, T. (2019). A survey on cybersecurity, data privacy, and policy issues in cyber-physical system deployments in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101660.
Halder, D., & Jaishankar, K. (2019). Cyber laws for preventing cyber crimes against women in Canada. Cyber Crime, 765–776. doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-323-2.ch405
Jacobsen, J. T. (2022). Cyberterrorism. Perspectives on terrorism, 16(5), 62-72.
Kagita, M. K., Thilakarathne, N., Gadekallu, T. R., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Singh, S. (2022). A review on cyber crimes on the internet of things. Deep Learning for Security and Privacy Preservation in IoT, 83-98.
Kaloudi, N., & Li, J. (2020). The ai-based cyber threat landscape: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(1), 1-34.
Katagiri, N. (2021). Why international law and norms do little in preventing non-state cyber attacks—Journal of cybersecurity, 7(1), tyab009.
Khan, S., Saleh, T., Dorasamy, M., Khan, N., Leng, O. T. S., & Vergara, R. G. (2022). A systematic literature review on cybercrime legislation. F1000Research, 11(971), 971.
Litvinenko, V. S. (2020). The digital economy is a factor in the technological development of the mineral sector. Natural Resources Research, 29(3), 1521-1541.
Lubis, M., & Handayani, D. O. D. (2022). The relationship of personal data protection towards internet addiction: Cyber crimes, pornography, and reduced physical activity. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 151-161.
Mohsin, K. (2021). The Internet and its Opportunities for Cybercrime–Interpersonal Cybercrime. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021. URL: https://doi. Org/10.2139/ssrn. 3815973 (date of request: 28.02. 2022).
Montasari, R. (2023). Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence in National Security: Applications and Issues. In Countering Cyberterrorism: The Confluence of Artificial Intelligence, Cyber Forensics and Digital Policing in US and UK National Cybersecurity (pp. 27-56). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ponde, S. (2022). Cyber Security.
Sen, A., Jena, G., Jena, S., & Devabalan, P. (2022). A Case Study on Defending against Cyber Crimes. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 1931-1938.
Sharma, M., & Kaur, S. (2019). Cyber crimes are becoming a threat to cyber security. Academic Journal of Forensic Sciences ISSN, 2581, 4273.
Smith, K. T., Jones, A., Johnson, L., & Smith, L. M. (2019). Examination of cybercrime and its effects on corporate stock value. Journal of Information, Communication, and Ethics in Society, 17(1), 42–60.
Solo, A. M. (2019). Combating Online Defamation and Doxing in the United States. In Proceedings on the International Conference on Internet Computing (ICOMP) (pp. 75–77). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldCom).
Taeihagh, A., & Lim, H. S. M. (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport reviews, 39(1), 103-128.
Williams, R. V., Huang, C., McDermott, C., Ahmed, T., Columbus, L., Moremen, K. W., … & Amster, I. J. (2022). Site-to-site cross-talk in OST-B glycosylation of hCEACAM1-IgV. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(43), e2202992119.