Racial disparities in the criminal justice system are well documented, with black and Hispanic individuals experiencing arrest, conviction, and incarceration at higher rates than whites for many crimes. However, the debate surrounding possible racial discrimination, explicit or implicit, in police and others primarily accounts for these differences between officers versus -Different racial offense rates associated with economic factors. Dissecting and quantifying the specific role of ethnicity in other policy factors. However, the social damage caused by minority generations entering the criminal justice system needs urgent repair regardless of the original cause. This paper examines the peer-reviewed research literature on the causes of race differences that emerge in terms of arrests, with a particular focus on the role of individual and systemic racism. Examines evidence-based policy solutions at the community, police department, and law enforcement levels. The central thesis is that effectively reducing racial disparities requires a coordinated response that targets the fundamental socio-economic problem of minority communities, underlying racial bias clarity in policing, and legislative reform in drug and criminal sentencing policies.
According to NAACP (2021), for all crimes, black Americans are arrested at a rate 2.5 times higher than white Americans. However, tracing trends through specific crime patterns reveals essential nuances. Racial disparities in incarceration rates for nonviolent drug offenses far outweigh comparable rates of self-reported drug use or sales. Despite only about 13% of reported illicit drug use in state surveys in 2018, 26% of black Americans were arrested for drug use and sales (SAMHSA, 2019), indicating that they are being disproportionately targeted by law enforcement. In comparison, arrest rates for violent crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault are similar to the racial breakdown of offenders reported by victims on the National Crime Survey (Lantz et al., 2021). For example, while African Americans represented 27% of aggravated assault arrests in 2018, the NCVS indicated that they represented 23% of victim-related aggravated assaults with racially sensitive issues and black offenders (FBI, 2018). 2019). Thus, the elimination of severe violent crimes resulting from arrests appears more consistent with overall crime patterns rather than with ethnic targets.
Variation in racial disparity rates across crime types has important implications for interpreting causes and solutions. The highly disproportionate arrest of black Americans for drug crimes but not for violent crimes suggests that different explanatory factors may be at play. Implicit or explicit racial bias plays a more significant role in police decisions to search or control minorities in “suspicious circumstances,” and ambiguous drug investigations versus prompt response are on emergency violence contradicts (Nellis, 2023). Similarly, policy factors that enable racial disparities appear to focus on specific areas, such as the war on drugs, mandatory minimums, and unfair sentencing laws for crack and powder cocaine, which were initially associated with higher incarceration rates for black defendants (Human et al., 2022). Overall, crime nuances suggest that no single issue, such as police bias or pure outstanding criminality, adequately explains the complex racial dynamics of crime. Instead, layers of overlapping biases and past policy decisions add to differentiation (Wesson et al., 2021). Understanding these challenges through a distinctive lens is critical to identifying tailored solutions that target more harmful anomalies. While racism likely disproportionately increases the risk of violence in neighborhoods where disadvantaged minorities persist (Sheats et al., 2018), preventing immediate violent crime requires that there are initiation programs relative to reversing disproportionately low levels of drug use. Solutions involving multiple coordinated variables are needed.
Explicit racial bias involves beliefs about racial groups. Underlying bias toward police officers may likely influence decisions to stop, search, or repeatedly arrest minority group members (Pryor et al., 2020). However, controlled trials and research on police behavior reveal mixed evidence of underlying racial discrimination. For example, extensive laboratory studies using gunshot simulators have generally found no racial differences in the likelihood that police will fire on armed suspects they are unarmed, regardless of perceived race (Smart et al., 2023). The findings suggest that explicit ethnic preferences play a minor or inconclusive role in very rapid decisions to use force when threat contexts are clear and ambiguous in violent conflict.
For this reason, observational data on proactive officer choices also renders a complex image of overt bias. A recent study analyzed 1.5 million traffic stops across North Carolina to determine the incidence of differential stop rate by race across time for Black vs White drivers, finding no evidence for aggregate racial differential effects on driver race and stopping practices (Pierson et al., 2020). Through the statewide consistency, it is not that officers were deliberately profiling or targeting non-White drivers for initial stop selections. Still, nevertheless, the officers finished the processes to achieve the illegal results. A second study into jurisdictions that criminalized marijuana possession was lacking in terms of whether racism was present or not in the changes of the possessed substance was reported by Sheehan et al. (2021) following the policy changes. However, the officer’s discretion in searches or controlling minorities perceived as not cooperative persists as a point of conscious judgment bias to potentially surface. Altogether, although apparent bias appears challenging to detect both through controlled experiments and some data from patrols, it is still possible that in some ambiguous cases, prejudice affects certain debatable arrest decisions (Machado & Lugo, 2021). Therefore, the overall bias awareness initiatives need to be present.
Unlike implicit prejudice, implicit bias operates unconsciously but can still influence perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors toward ethnic groups (Vela et al., 2022). For police officers, implicit biases may influence split-second decisions about force or suspicion assessments to use when interacting with citizens and may produce racially disparate results. There have even been results in police officers consciously acknowledging bias (Scholarworks & Moffett, 2020). Controlled experiments show that police officers exhibit an underlying downward bias that associates Black Americans with violence, violence, and weapons (James, 2017). This unconscious bias is evident in laboratory gun studies, where police are more likely to mistakenly shoot unarmed black suspects compared to unarmed whites (Pleskac et al., 2017). Such a two-second “voter bias” can create real-world racial disparities in police killings. However, whether implicit bias also leads to disproportionate arrests is highly debatable. Shooter bias research examines hypothetical simulated scenarios rather than observable patrol behavior. The effect is likely to depend on individual and situational variables. For communications that are not immediate, officers may have time to override initial responses motivated by implicit bias consciously. The random nature of the patrol also means that the results depend more on the communities’ police encounters, not just police bias.
Nevertheless, the potential for implicit bias in shaky police perceptions of cues, situational assessments, and decisions remains a concern in enforcement settings. For example, an officer might view the same ambiguous behavior as highly suspicious when a young black man exhibits it to an unknowing white woman. Such biases can lead to increased searches and questions that can lead to searches that repeatedly identify restricted items for minority populations. Even when conducted respectfully, a disproportionate level of scrutiny motivated by implicit bias can undermine community trust and perceived legitimacy in the police (Gopal et al., 2021). After all, the complexity of frontline policing suggests that implicit attitudes are likely to manifest indirectly at the individual level, making aggregate effects on differences challenging to isolate and quantify. However, unconscious biases can still shape important decisions with self-reinforcing effects.
In addition to individual-level bias, systemic racism offers an alternative explanatory framework for racial and criminal justice disparities that focuses on institutional structures, practices, and cultural norms that perpetuate racial disparities across settings (Larrabee Sonderlund et al., 2022). Examples of systemic racism, particularly in criminal justice, include:
Collectively, systems of racist policies that structure decision points through the criminal justice funnel increase the overall risk of contact and incarceration for minorities compared to whites for similar crimes (Larrabee Sonderlund et al., 2022). These policies interact with the class again, and the poor commit disproportionate crimes. Then, the loss of consciousness that results in low-performing minority neighborhoods from prominent housing and economic discrimination in the past maintains a cycle that contributes to violence and risk of crime (Draginja Vuksanović). -Stankovic et al., 2023). Overall, the direct and indirect consequences of decades of racist laws, policies, practices, and cultural norms that result in unequal treatment of minorities are evident today as racial inequality and attitudes that permeate law enforcement and incarceration.
An alternative challenges the racism argument by differentially engaging racially in higher levels of serious delinquency removal. Clearance rates refer to the proportion of reported crimes solved through arrests. Serious violent crimes such as murder have a high clearance rate of about 60% (Gramlich, 2020). Studies of torture also show similar racial disparities in arrests for serious violent crimes, suggesting that the use of these crimes equally targets people who have committed crimes (Rezey & Lauritsen, 2022). Advocates argue that higher arrests of blacks simply reflect higher rates of violence and crime in minority neighborhoods (Wilson & Herrnstein, 1985). However, critics contend that “black-on-black” criminology ignores the role of systemic racism in fueling violence. Central poverty and disenfranchisement in isolated inner cities are associated with violent crime, which means that solutions must target the root causes, such as lack of income, jobs, and lack of resources (South). et al., 2021). Despite arguments about differential interventions, reducing harm in marginalized communities remains essential to social justice.
Research points to multiple interacting factors in explaining racial prejudice disparities, including possible entitlement bias, disparate impact policies and practices, and aggregation of violence risks in a few isolated areas. Separating the specific contributions of racism is challenging. However, Ariel et al. (2019) argue that distinctions between errors’ uniqueness and differentiation between codes may be less critical. Regardless of the original cause, criminalizing large generations of blacks and destabilizing families/communities is itself a damaging form of systemic racism that needs to be addressed.
Individual criminal policies, institutional policies, fewer and fewer individual policies, and the structural, social, and economic consequences of layers of criminal codes are essential for light and complex characterization. Small changes have failed in previous reform efforts (Nembhard & Robin, 2021). Showing Promise is a comprehensive collection of evidence-based solutions, implemented simultaneously to attack disparities from multiple sources, including communities, police departments, law enforcement, the education system, and the public idea Concerted efforts in policy areas such as police training, law reform, and community investment Along with, seasonal racial tensions can be constructively reduced. It has broad implications for equality. Several promising specific reforms supported by research include:
Implicit bias training – Given the variability of impacts depending on the quality and content of a program and the motivation level of an officer, implicit bias training seems to be a viable alternative that could be implemented into the police department’s training strategies to reduce automatic stereotyping and raise self-awareness among police officers (James, 2017). Nevertheless, several programs available include lecture-based instruction on bias concepts that do not heavily engage the senses of learning and may not result in attitudinal or behavioral change that may be postponed after the end of training. The most likely delivery of more impactful formats, which focus on the experiential part of the learner based on sticky results, is immersive. For instance, interactive VR simulations allow officers to navigate diverse community scenarios and obtain performance-based feedback on the bias. One is that the simulated 1s are risk-free opportunities to practice finding and overriding one’s bias in situational judgment. The excellent outcomes identify the precedence of simulated personalization training systems concerning high discretion tasks such as defining ambiguous calls or rational suspicion forms for stops, according to James et al. (2017). Courses in cutting-edge training programs should be coupled with oversight bodies, body cameras, data transparency, and policies that govern areas easily susceptible to bias, such as traffic stops or use of force for maximum effect.
Demilitarizing Police Forces– Police force participation refers to advanced weaponry, tactical equipment available to forces, and a cultural shift in enforcement mechanisms that emphasize violent conflict in community relations (Lawson, 2018). Demilitarization aims to reverse these trends by banning military-style equipment such as armored vehicles, assault rifles, camouflaged grenades, and uniform cover-ups. Training also shifts from combat readiness to nonviolent conflict. Emerging research links police militarization to measurable harm, including increased racial disparities in police-involved homicides (Lawson, 2018). Heavily militarized groups are likely to violently escalate encounters with suspects exhibiting mental illness or drug use. Restricted teams interacting with particularly marginalized groups on special mandates also undermine broader public confidence in the police, particularly in smaller communities (Peyton et al., 2019). Apprehension at the reversing of the military culture to drastically magnify the image of civilians is marred with impressive Promise over the minimization of racial discord and lethal violence. More research is required, even though the preliminary responses from many communities indicate that demilitarization policies prove useful for reestablishing legitimate public attention and healthy relationships among police and people of color.
Relaxing drug penalties – However, the abolition of severe mandatory minimum sentences and laws should legalize recreational drug use at the level of state or nation, which could decrease total arrests and prison times deriving from crimes of victimless substance abuse. Despite the emergence of these reforms, they have a clear potential to help deal with racial inequalities concentrated in creating drug law enforcement (Ramirez et al., 2022). For instance, the federal level 2010 Fair Sentencing Act contributed toward the efforts to lower the difference that had been being meted out in the sentencing of crack and powder cocaine possession that was legislated before, namely the earlier laws that only increased incarceration and penalization of black people. Other developments there occurred during the 2018 First Step Act. Without getting into specifics of enabling crime, the article on legalizing marijuana quotes Lu et al. (2019), pointing out that across US states that legalized marijuana, crime rates remain stable or even decrease, with no specific adverse effects that increase crime in the communities of minorities (Lu et al., 2019). Alternatively, a sustainable transition has to be attached to community programming. Attempts at legalization or decriminalization should, at the same time, increase prevention education; the availability of substance use disorder and mental health care policies must be the significant practices for derived advantages. Although such balanced drug policy changes bring enormous potential to positively systematic marginalization of wide criminalization, drug law reforms are significant alterations in it.
Investing in communities – Lasting positive change requires addressing underlying socio-economic factors causally chain linked to racial differences in criminal justice, as concentrated poverty and disadvantage disproportionately cluster on marginalized minority communities. Arranged long-term public consumption in troubled communities has the potential to minimize aggressive elements, including interruption of the pattern of school and jail. Initiatives based on evidence include increased access to affordable housing, employment programs, transportation, improvement in healthcare services, investments in youth educational and enrichment programs, and offering hiring incentives to companies for employees with previous criminal justice contact (Cohen et al., 2022). Community-based outreach models that have relied on former gang members and crisis responders as the interrupters of emerging interpersonal conflicts have also demonstrated effectiveness when connecting high-risk individuals with social services and sources of support (Cerdá et al., 2018). Collectively, the divestment of public capital to continue criminalizing generations of minorities toward preventative investment in health, opportunity, and welfare-oriented options firmly across minority neighborhoods represents a progressive trajectory on reducing racial variability from the basis up.
In conclusion, racial disparities in the criminal justice system have complex, interacting components based on a long history of overt and subtle oppression. Although individual families’ implicit discrimination continues to operate through explicit racial discrimination, unconscious bias, discriminatory measures, policies, behavioral imposed, and cultural norms Providing a set of racial outcomes, inequality continues. Consequently, increased disadvantage in a few underserved communities also perpetuates a vicious cycle rooted in economic and social marginalization. Evidence-based approaches affecting community funding will shut down more, police reforms targeting militarization and implicit bias, legislative reforms relaxing drug penalties, and prevention policies promise to address constructive differences. Challenging social insecurity by perpetuating minority and institutional inequities in criminal justice will require compassion, continued public education, and politically supporting arguments. Unraveling centuries of systematic racism is no small task. However, prioritizing harm reduction in struggling communities and promoting reforms to address individual systemic biases can snowball toward greater justice and opportunity in the long run. Collaborative efforts lead to significant reductions in racial crime and break the cycle of injustice.
Ariel, B., Englefield, A., & Denley, J. (2019). “I Heard It Through the Grapevine”: A Randomized Controlled Trial On the Direct And Vicarious Effects Of Preventative Specific Deterrence Initiatives In Criminal Networks. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 109(4), 819–867. https://doi.org/10.2307/48572944
Cerdá, M., Tracy, M., & Keyes, K. M. (2018). Reducing Urban Violence. Epidemiology, 29(1), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000756
Cohen, A., Vakharia, S. P., Netherland, J., & Frederique, K. (2022). How does the war on drugs impact social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system? Annals of Medicine, 54(1), 2024–2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2100926
Concannon, C., & Na, C. (2023). Examining Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Prosecutor’s Bail Requests and Downstream Decision-making. Race and Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-022-09385-0
Draginja Vuksanović-Stankovic, Nemanja Radojevic, Batric Vukcevic, Jovovic, A., & Subramanian, S. (2023). Socio-Economic Characteristics and Risk Factors Affecting Domestic Violence in Montenegro: A Case-Control Study. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i6.12987
FBI. (2019). Table 43. FBI. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/topic-pages/tables/table-43
Gopal, D. P., Chetty, U., O’Donnell, P., Gajria, C., & Blackadder-Weinstein, J. (2021). Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research, and decision making. Future Healthcare Journal, 8(1), 40–48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004354/
Gramlich, J. (2020, November 20). What the data says (and does not say) about crime in the United States. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/11/20/facts-about-crime-in-the-u-s/
Human Rights Watch. (2022, August 8). Racial Discrimination in the United States: Human Rights Watch / ACLU Joint Submission Regarding the United States’ Record Under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Human Rights Watch; Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2022/08/08/racial-discrimination-united-states/human-rights-watch/aclu-joint-submission
James, L. (2017). The Stability of Implicit Racial Bias in Police Officers. Police Quarterly, 21(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611117732974
Lantz, B., Wenger, M. R., & Craig, C. J. (2021). What If They Were White? The Differential Arrest Consequences of Victim Characteristics for Black and White Co-offenders. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab043
Larrabee Sonderlund, A., Charifson, M., Ortiz, R., Khan, M., Schoenthaler, A., & Williams, N. J. (2022). A comprehensive framework for operationalizing structural racism in health research: The association between mass incarceration of Black people in the US and adverse birth outcomes. SSM – Population Health, 19, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101225
Lawson, E. (2018). TRENDS: Police Militarization and the Use of Lethal Force. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918784209
Machado, M. A., & Lugo, A. M. (2021). A Behavioral Analysis of Two Strategies to Eliminate Racial Bias in Police Use of Force. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00551-1
NAACP. (2021, May 24). Criminal Justice Fact Sheet. Naacp.org; NAACP. https://naacp.org/resources/criminal-justice-fact-sheet
Nellis, A. (2023, January 25). Mass Incarceration Trends. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/reports/mass-incarceration-trends/
Nembhard, S., & Robin, L. (2021). Racial and Ethnic Disparities Throughout the Criminal Legal System: A Result of Racist Policies and Discretionary Practices. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/104687/racial-and-ethnic-disparities-throughout-the-criminal-legal-system.pdf
Peyton, K., Sierra-Arévalo, M., & Rand, D. G. (2019). A Field Experiment on Community Policing and Police Legitimacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(40), 19894–19898. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910157116
Pierson, E., Simoiu, C., Overgoor, J., Corbett-Davies, S., Jenson, D., Shoemaker, A., Ramachandran, V., Barghouty, P., Phillips, C., Shroff, R., & Goel, S. (2020). A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0858-1
Pleskac, T. J., Cesario, J., & Johnson, D. J. (2017). How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(4), 1301–1330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6
Pryor, M., Buchanan, K. S., & Goff, P. A. (2020). Risky Situations: Sources of Racial Disparity in Police Behavior. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16(1), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042633
Ramirez, S., Douglas, A., Cummings, S., & Ramirez. (2022). The Racist Roots of War on Drugs the Myth of Equal Racist Roots of the War on Drugs & the Myth of Equal Protection for People of Color Protection for People of Color Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Recommended Citation. Retrieved February 3, 2024, from https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1724&context=facpubs
Rezey, M. L., & Lauritsen, J. L. (2022). Crime Reporting in Chicago: A Comparison of Police and Victim Survey Data, 1999–2018. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 002242782210980. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221098053
SAMHSA. (2019). 2019 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Releases | CBHSQ Data. Www.samhsa.gov. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/release/2019-national-survey-drug-use-and-health-nsduh-releases
Scholarworks, S., & Moffett, B. (2021). Influence of Implicit Racial Bias on Police Officers’ Decision to Influence of Implicit Racial Bias on Police Officers’ Decision to Use Force Use Force. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10471&context=dissertations
Sheats, K. J., Irving, S. M., Mercy, J. A., Simon, T. R., Crosby, A. E., Ford, D. C., Merrick, M. T., Annor, F. B., & Morgan, R. E. (2018). Violence-Related Disparities Experienced by Black Youth and Young Adults: Opportunities for Prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(4), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.017
Sheehan, B. E., Grucza, R. A., & Plunk, A. D. (2021). Association of Racial Disparity of Cannabis Possession Arrests Among Adults and Youths With Statewide Cannabis Decriminalization and Legalization. JAMA Health Forum, 2(10), e213435. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3435
Smart, R., Barnes-Proby, D., Holmes, P., Schell, T. L., & Morral, A. R. (2023). Racial and ethnic differences in the effects of state firearm laws: a systematic review subgroup analysis. Injury Epidemiology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-023-00477-y
South, E. C., MacDonald, J., & Reina, V. (2021). Association Between Structural Housing Repairs for Low-Income Homeowners and Neighborhood Crime. JAMA Network Open, 4(7), e2117067. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17067
Strange, C. C., Cochran, J. C., Wooldridge, J., & Feldmeyer, B. (2021). Sentencing Add-Ons and Implications for Disparities in a Guidelines State. Crime & Delinquency, 001112872110475. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211047539
Testa, A., & Lee, J. G. (2020). Trends in Sentencing of Federal Drug Offenders: Findings From U.S. District Courts 2002–2017. Journal of Drug Issues, 51(1), 002204262095907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042620959071
Vela, M. B., Erondu, A. I., Smith, N. A., Peek, M. E., Woodruff, J. N., & Chin, M. H. (2022). Eliminating explicit and implicit biases in health care: Evidence and research needs. Annual Review of Public Health, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528
Wesson, P., Hswen, Y., Valdez, G., Stojanovski, K., & Handley, M. A. (2021). Risks and Opportunities to Ensure Equity in Applying Big Data Research in Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-110928