Homelessness is a problematic issue in Thurston County, Washington, that has profound effects not only on the individuals but also on the entire society. As residents, we should be addressing this matter with empathy and urgency. For the 2023 Thurston County Homeless Census, 740 individuals were identified as homeless. The number included those who were unsheltered, living in vehicles, and occupying emergency and transitional shelters (Thurston Regional Planning Council, WA, par. 1). Although there was a 26% decline from the 995 individuals in 2020, the number of unhoused people is probably undercounted as a consequence of inflated figures from uncounted individuals or those on the run and staying with friends, family, jails, or hospitals. Notably, about 59% of homeless people were unsheltered in 2022, using cars, tents, parks, sidewalks, or abandoned buildings for living. In addition, a rise of 22% in the number of public school students categorized as homeless during the 2021-22 and 2022-23 school years is reported, with a total count of 1,265 students. Nevertheless, as of the 2018-2019 academic year, 1,362 students are at their peak, and many are sharing rooms with others. This paper suggests a solution for this grave problem by providing supportive housing programs to eliminate homelessness in Thurston County.
In Thurston County, the landscape of homelessness is growing at rapid speed despite the growing number of housing average costs and the overall community’s prosperity. The rapid growth in the number of people without shelter, represented by the spike in unsheltered individuals, unsanctioned encampments, and vehicle camping, clearly indicates the authorities’ failures to adequately assess the magnitude of the problem. Consequently, the Thurston County Board of Health determined homelessness a public health emergency in their June 2018 resolution, opening a new level of collaborative activities (Menser et al. 7). Now, the focus shifts to the Homeless Crisis Response System (HCRS) to promptly place unstably sheltered individuals into permanent housing, reflecting the community’s struggle to eliminate the calamity.
Thurston County, like lots of other places in the States, is highly concerned about the problematic issues connected to homelessness, as they are usually a result of complex social and economic reasons. A considerable risk to financial stability in our society is the number of people losing their jobs and evictions due to non-payment (Thurston Thrives 17). In addition to the scarce availability of affordable housing, this issue becomes much more complicated, making it challenging for families and individuals to obtain a safe place to live. Besides this, mental health problems and family dissociation are the significant causes of homelessness as they break down the already existing supports and worsen even personal issues.
Supportive housing initiative for the homeless population of Thurston County is another step forward towards solving the critical problems of homelessness within our community, which is multilevel and complicated. Recognizing homelessness as a multifaceted issue, the campaign highlights the necessity of implementing all-inclusive measures beyond securing shelter. These approaches are post-shelter types of aid in which housing programs work around the constraints of conventional shelter services by designing one relevant to the specific challenges of each homeless person. Unlike traditional shelters, supportive housing is set up to give people a stable home and a host of services designed to address the underlying issues that may affect their self-sufficiency. In this approach, supportive housing programs equip individuals to overcome the many complex problems underlying their homelessness. This includes navigating life on the streets and emerging from homelessness with stability, resilience, and self-sufficiency.
A supportive housing program, in turn, constitutes a complex solution that combines housing with the set of necessary support services that are specially designed, taking into account the different needs of people who are homeless. These social services are on the broadest spectrum, including essential mental health counseling and substance abuse treatments, vocational education and skill development, and healthcare access facilitation (Meredith 5). Through exploring the root causes of homelessness and ensuring the sustenance of assistance, supportive housing initiatives fulfill the role of a catalyst assisting persons in reassuming control over their lives, becoming self-sufficient, and restoring status and dignity. These programs create a complete support network that helps solve the current housing needs and provides grounds for long-term adaptation, allowing people to work with and overcome the obstacles they face.
To ensure the effectiveness of supportive housing programs, it is essential to establish a strong network of organizations comprising government agencies, nonprofit organizations, healthcare providers, housing developers, and community members operating as a team (Thurston Thrives 32). This collaborative exercise involves a multifaceted approach embodied by a set of several dominant components crucial for the successful functioning of this program. However, the process of securing the funds might be critical because it should be about providing the required financial resources to continue and develop supportive housing programs. Besides, finding positions for the development of the supporting housing centers is central, which involves determining the sites based on factors like integration with services and community. In addition, creating community engagement and cooperation works as a cornerstone, helping get the whole community’s support and dealing with homelessness as an entire social equity issue in Thurston County.
With supportive housing projects being prioritized, Thurston County gets closer and stronger at the issue of mitigating homelessness, enhancing public health and safety, and helping social equity and inclusion. The tipping point in this favor represents a practical and compassionate road to solving the complicated issue of homelessness, which depicts the community’s gathering every effort to help those in need and build a society full of resilience and heart. Unlike other solutions that only address the immediate needs of people experiencing homelessness, Thurston County seeks to identify the root causes and provide individuals with stable housing and essential support services in the long term (Medicine et al. 33). Therefore, Thurston County seeks to alleviate immediate housing challenges and create a place where everyone can contribute positively to the community’s well-being. It is evidence of the community’s effort to create a more compassionate society where the comfort and dignity of a person matter a lot.
Supportive housing programs are characterized by many benefits that are not restricted to providing shelter. Firstly, they provide stability for homeless people who need a safe and secure vicinity where they can call home (BC Housing 1). Housing people experiencing homelessness is essential to reviving dignity and self-respect in their eyes since getting housing brings stability that allows people to fix their lives. The housing platform supports people who otherwise would have been homeless from the uncertainty of such circumstances. In this way, the individual gains control over their situation and aims at life fulfillment. Not only does the stability of housing help individuals overcome particularly challenging conditions, but it also assists them in solving their more comprehensive problems: securing employment, receiving healthcare services, and communicating with their neighbors. Finally, stability and worthiness are the essential elements of stable housing programs, and these elements are the foundation that individuals rely on to continue their individual lives and embark on the journey to long-term stability, independence, and a new sense of worth in their lives.
Holistic Support Services: Supportive housing programs provide a holistic approach by providing the support services individuals require to address their various needs. The core element of these programs is delivering healthcare services, which entails medical care, mental health counseling, and substance abuse treatment. Through these services, residents’ physical and emotional well-being will be engulfed. Moreover, counseling services allow people to tackle the ones linked to their inner feelings and psychological problems, becoming more robust and empowering their personalities. Furthermore, supportive housing programs ensure residents have something to rely on regarding employment training and life skills development programs (BC Housing 5). Under the scope of these plans, such people may acquire the required skills to get stable jobs, reach financial stability, and smoothly return to the community. Through the provision of a wide range of assistance services, the supportive housing programs not only address the immediate housing needs but also help people conquer problems, strengthen themselves, and eventually integrate into the community landscape of Thurston County.
Cost-Effectiveness: Supportive housing programs have proven their effectiveness for the cost due to their long-term net return despite hefty up-front investments. While the one-time usage of the amount may seem considerable, the aggregate savings are astounding (Medicine et al. 58). By reducing the consumption of emergency services, shelters, and jails, supported housing programs not only improve the situation of taxpayers’ wallets but also stop the government from eroding the resources used. These services are diverting formerly used short-term emergency methods to coherent long-term ones that combat the deep-seated factors of homelessness. Thus, supportive housing is a wise investment in addition to yielding considerable economic benefits, which make the communities and individuals with it stable and resilient.
Integration into the Community: Additionally, the supportive housing encourages integration and community involvement that enriches the human fabric of the neighborhood. Supportive house programs enable residents to engage in the community’s activities, gain education, and contribute to their environment. Thus, it creates a feeling of belonging and inclusion for the residents. Through the empowerment of participating in neighborhood activities, people can acquire support and bonds that help to resolve these prejudices and misunderstandings. These initiatives foster social harmony by ensuring everyone is accepted and no one is left behind, leading to a strong society that offers equal opportunities.
Collaboration is the secret sauce that facilitates the effective development and sustainability of supportive housing programs through multiple stakeholders, each having an integral role. Before anything else, acquiring the cooperation of housing providers, developers, and nonprofit organizations will be essential to start looking for suitable locations. Assisting the construction of supportive housing facilities throughout the county (Thurston et al., par. 4). Through cooperation with these actors, Thurston County authorities can guarantee homogeneity of housing opportunities that meet the various needs of homeless people. Another constituent of the housing program is the partnership with healthcare companies, social service agencies, and mental health organizations to make sure that the residents of the housing program get holistic support addressing some of the underlying factors leading to homelessness, for example, mental health care, substance abuse treatment, and medical services.
The initiatives to advocate and educate are critical to obtaining the community’s backing and getting financial support for supportive housing projects. By exploiting strategic community outreach, educational campaigns, and active participation in the policy process, advocates can enlighten people about the utility of supportive housing and unite the necessary resources to support these programs in the long run (Yerena 3). Thurston County can showcase its commitment to addressing homelessness and creating social equality for the citizens and community by promoting the utilization of public funds for supportive housing.
The fourth strategy is involving community members actively, and facilitating dialogue is critical to dismiss misconceptions and mitigate concerns about supportive housing. Providing residents, business people, and community leaders with opportunities to participate and make informed decisions in constructive discussions develops an environment that supports the flourishing of funded housing programs, thereby fostering their acceptance. The interaction fosters mutual understanding and collaboration and creates a feeling of joint responsibility and shared destiny to fight against homelessness locally and promote inclusivity in our city.
Although the proposal for supportive housing projects in Thurston County may be a praising solution to homelessness, serious questions are still raised regarding the continuity and cost-effectiveness of such moves. While acknowledging the long-term benefits, the critics maintain that the initial outlay could overburden resources and, thus, lead the funds away from other urgent needs like education and health (BC Housing 3). The continuous expense of operation, including staff and care, which need funding, raises a financial burden for local government and taxpayers, especially where the source of income is not guaranteed. Interrogators challenge the efficiency of such programs and their potential to adapt to the changing needs of homeless populations. Lacking sound financial planning and sustainable finance schemes is the likely reason why supportive housing initiatives may end up being financially unsustainable. Thus leaving both individuals and the whole community unprotected from the outbreak of any financial constraints and service interruptions.
The second major counterargument to implementing supportive housing programs is often related to the anticipated social and neighborhood impacts. The supporters say these facilities should be used to integrate and address the concerns of people experiencing homelessness (BC Housing 4). However, the opponents are concerned about stigmatization and potential resistance of the residents and businesses against these concentrated facilities, which can lead to increased tensions and no further growth. Critics fear that the facilities can hurt the value of real estate and how people view public safety, aesthetics, and lifestyle quality, suggesting that this could lower the quality of life and create insecurity. They also see the need for more clarity in setting up clear guidelines and frameworks as challenges like sound, hygiene, and community harmony increase. However, the lack of proactive actions to tackle these issues and include stakeholders will create obstacles for supportive housing initiatives due to the risk of resistance and opposition, which may undermine their overall effect and future sustainability.
In the case of Thurston County’s case, having supportive housing plans is a critical solution that demands a well-coordinated and integrated approach when dealing with homelessness. The existing situation of homelessness, namely economic uncertainty and housing costs that are way beyond control, mental health, as well as drug and alcohol abuse, highlights the need for preventive measures. Supportive housing initiatives offer residents more than shelter; they promote stability, dignity, and care to banish homelessness. With the cooperation of stakeholders, including county government, nonprofits, healthcare injectors, and members of society, Thurston County can address the question of homelessness by improving public health, safety, and social justice. The advantages of supportive housing programs, including stability, coordinated care services, cost-effectiveness, and social reintegration, show they efficiently solve homelessness. Advocacy, education, and community engagement in Thurston County Homelessness will be where people will not live on the streets anymore but in a more sympathetic society ready to join and fight homelessness.
BC Housing. Community Benefits of Supportive Housing. 2022, www.bchousing.org/sites/default/files/rcg-documents/2022-04/Community-Benefits-Supportive-Housing_1.pdf.
Medicine, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, et al. “Permanent Supportive Housing: Evaluating the Evidence for Improving Health Outcomes among People Experiencing Chronic Homelessness.” Google Books, National Academies Press, 2019, books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=v-BjDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Permanent+Supportive+Housing:+Evaluating+the+Evidence+for+Improving+Health+Outcomes+Among+People+Experiencing+
Chronic+Homelessness+2rd+Edition&ots=GuJ7AQ7U7S&sig=L2b7woDJP4s50bTGHtAPYm57vCc. Accessed 1 Mar. 2024.
Menser, Tye, et al. Contributors and Acknowledgements Thurston County Commissioners Homeless Crisis Response Planning Team City of Olympia Staff City of Lacey Staff City of Tumwater Staff Yelm Homeless Task Force. 2019, s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/thurstoncountywa.gov.if-us-west-2/s3fs-public/2023-01/BOCC_brddoc_FINAL-Housing5YearPlan_0.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar. 2024.
Meredith, Michael Lee. “Homeless Barriers: A Phenomenological Study of Service Providers in Thurston County, Washington State – ProQuest.” https://www.proquest.com/openview/38215d91e4bba4871a2d4a4227790b6a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Thurston County, Washington. “Office of Housing & Homeless Prevention | Thurston County.” Www.thurstoncountywa.gov, 2020, www.thurstoncountywa.gov/departments/public-health-and-social-services/social-services/office-housing-and-homeless#:~:text=This%20is%20done%20through%20the. Accessed 1 Mar. 2024.
Thurston Regional Planning Council, WA. “Homeless Census | Thurston Regional Planning Council, WA.” Www.trpc.org, 2022, www.trpc.org/457/Homeless-Census#:~:text=Explanation.
Thurston Thrives. Thurston County Homeless Census Report. 2019, thurstonthrives.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2019-Thurston-County-Homeless-Census-Report.pdf.
Yerena, Anaid. “Strategic Action for Affordable Housing: How Advocacy Organizations Accomplish Policy Change.” Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 43, no. 3, Nov. 2019, p. 0739456X1988800, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456×19888000.