The US has concentrated more on the connections between racial injustices, trauma, and resilience in older minorities. People need to be aware of concerns about minority senior people because these individuals are more likely to experience racial injustices. The distribution of healthcare is becoming more significant as a result of shifting demographics. The complex relationship between traumatic experiences and end-of-life resilience in SSA minorities, particularly racial minorities, is examined in this essay. The intricate and distinct lives of older members of minority groups are made more understandable by the obligatory influence of elements such as racial and ethnic health inequalities in specific types of mortality and the persistent consequences of systemic prejudices and unfairness. Due to their significance, the foundations of good health in high-risk individuals should be the main focus of this research. The study aims to promote healthy aging in the community and equitable access to healthcare.
There are theoretical and analytical linkages between the text and the more significant class issues associated with socioeconomic determinants of health, aging, and resilience. It explores how social and behavioral theories emphasize the importance of social variables and biological determinants in the formation of health inequalities among minority communities (Kwong et al. 138). The text refers to the idea of historical trauma, which emphasizes the collective emotional and psychological pain that is the outcome of large-scale traumatic experiences that generations have experienced.
The study revealed that effective resilience strategies targeting the most susceptible sectors of society, predominantly minorities and immigrants, can significantly influence life expectancy. Resilience is a widely accepted approach used by the relevant communities to address the vulnerabilities caused by the reliance on culturally diverse populations. Tailored tactics must acknowledge and honor the unique characteristics of these populations (Kwong et al. 138). These methods should draw upon the strengths and requirements of these sub-populations as their foundation for effectiveness.
The article contributes to broader discussions on health inequities, aging, and community-level resilience beyond the confines of traditional classroom lessons. This approach highlights certain aspects of social determinants of health and focuses on the involvement of community-based networks in promoting healthy aging among minority communities. Furthermore, it raises the issue of incorporating culturally diverse older Americans into health and social services, considering the distinct cultural requirements of older individuals from various demographic groups and immigration backgrounds (Kwong et al. 137). Based on the content of this study, resilience is a fluid process that socio-cultural factors can influence. Therefore, it is crucial to consider this when developing a health promotion intervention or providing healthcare services to various populations.
The viewpoint that Kwong, Katherine, Yan Du, and Qingwen (2015) presented in their statement that “trauma” is a concise summary of the key topic that is explored in the article (Kwong et al. 137). This serves as a reminder that some individuals construct a distinction between adolescents and the orthodox and standard life system; these individuals are undoubtedly a crucial indicator that demonstrates that there is ongoing discrimination as well as chronic discrimination of minority older adults. This point of view, which reflects the translation of social conditioning into a daily grind, could unwittingly lead to impaired physiological and emotional trajectories when considered. This perspective aims to integrate the fundamental nature of trauma and recovery with the context of socioeconomic variables. This perspective attempts to make the experience of marginalized groups more visible. It is a fundamental principle that rather than taking individual efforts, combined actions should be conducted to reduce systemic inequities and to guarantee that all aging populations, particularly minority populations, which bear a disproportionate burden of preventable diseases and mortality, enjoy equitable health outcomes (Kwong et al. 139). In this age of digital transformation, the role those innovative technologies play is crucial.
The emphasis placed on the resiliency of older members of minority populations is one distinctive feature that motivates individuals and provides them with something to contemplate. It is demonstrated in the article that older adults possess the intrinsic capacity to equip themselves with the crucial life skills that will enable them to persevere through a wide variety of forms of prejudice and hardship, such as racism and oppression. Isolation from their social circle is acknowledged as a burdensome hardship for them (Kwong et al. 140). Nevertheless, as a result of this, they can develop distinctive advantages and coping mechanisms that enable them to triumph over the anguish of being a minority and the institutional racism they are forced to face. This is consistent with the resilience perspective, which leads to an optimistic outlook. It implies that minority elders are highly adaptable, resilient individuals with unlimited spirit locations even though they are confronted with significant problems.
Nevertheless, they are collectively responsible for bringing to light the architectural and design choices made by society that have resulted in the advent of this phenomenon. Even though the existence of such polarisation raises several problems concerning the underlying causes of various forms of discrimination and variations in the health outcomes of different ethnic groups, it is undeniable that resilience is something that should be evaluated and appreciated (Kwong et al. 140). The primary factor that will contribute to the community becoming more equitable and supportive of these senior people is one where the root of all such problems is being addressed.
The article provides a thorough analysis of the connection between trauma, resilience, and health outcomes in minority older persons, with a specific emphasis on the disparities in aging populations based on race and ethnicity in the United States. I appreciate the text’s profound analysis and emphasis on a frequently neglected group. The conversation surrounding the unequal weight of avoidable illnesses, death rates, and impairment experienced by minority seniors as a result of factors, including the prevalence of chronic diseases and prejudice, is enlightening. This underscores the pressing necessity for focused interventions and policies to tackle the underlying inequities that lead to these discrepancies (Kwong et al. 141). The essay emphasizes the significance of taking into account social determinants of health, cultural contexts, and past trauma when comprehending the experiences of minority older persons.
To put it briefly, the disease, trauma, resilience to stress, and health outcomes of older people from a minority background are tied to the necessity of groups from different cultures to see aging happening in a different light. This phenomenon can be realized through multicultural dialogues. The aged black person is directly linked with chauvinism, a higher COVID-19 death rate, encounters with racism as well as structural inequalities. It is indisputable that the path to success in vulnerable communities is full of obstacles, but within them always lies the capacity to overcome adversity. Unyielding resistance of this sort may cause a feeling of empowerment among the communities as they struggle to deal with suppression and difficulties in their situations. The older generation becomes part of the decision-making process as their experience clips into the research and policy discussions. These efforts aim to support the development of tailored therapies and policy reforms to promote healthy aging for all older individuals.
Kwong, Katherine, Yan Du, and Qingwen Xu. “Healthy aging of minority and immigrant populations: Resilience in late life.” Traumatology 21.3 2015: 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/trm0000034