Over a decade since the UK debate on housing inequality has remained a pervasive social injustice, limiting equal opportunities for most residents. Prejudiced policies like redlining and racial covenants have been the root causes of segregation based on race and social status, which can still be traced in the Airbnb housing market today (Cashin, 2021). Despite efforts to tackle overt discrimination, underlying disparities persist, particularly for Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic groups (Bristow, 2021). Homelessness and lack of homeownership outcomes remain a perennial problem for these groups, reflecting the deeply rooted housing inequality. Despite measures to eradicate discriminatory practices, systematic barriers persist, taking a toll on housing for marginalized and vulnerable groups (Clarkson-Hendrix & Cyr, 2023). According to Chisumbe 2024, Neoliberalism emphasizes individualistic elements, exacerbating housing disparities. Understanding historical shifts is crucial in designing winning strategies to address housing complexity in the UK.
The roots of housing inequality in the UK lie in discriminatory policies such as redlining and racial covenants, which have resulted in segregation along racial and economic lines. (Cashin, 2021) Although there has been progress in countering overt discrimination, minorities – mainly Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) communities – continue to face disadvantages in the housing market, homelessness rates, and homeownership rates compared to their White counterparts (Bristow, 2021). The consequences of housing inequality extend beyond physical housing environments, significantly impacting individuals and communities. Insecure housing, displacement, and poor dwelling conditions are associated with a wide range of mental and physical health problems, including chronic stress, depression, and respiratory illnesses (Suel et al., 2019). The scarcity of affordable and safe housing perpetuates economic inequality, which hinders access to education and employment and restricts socio-economic mobility. According to Clarkson-Hendrix and Cyr (2023), these effects are particularly severe for marginalized and vulnerable groups, such as low-income families, people with disabilities, and racial and ethnic minorities, who face multiple intersecting forms of discrimination.
Chisumbe (2024) argues that neoliberal policies have prioritized individualistic solutions to housing inequality, treating housing as a commodity instead of a fundamental human right. That has led to a focus on promoting individual homeownership while neglecting community-based solutions (Rojset al., 2020). Selling off public housing and reducing regulations like rent controls increase housing prices and worsen inequality (Kährik & Pastak, 2023). Rolnik (2019) says that this market-oriented ideology has turned housing into a speculative investment, making it difficult for vulnerable communities to access housing and turning it into a volatile market force.
The field of psychology has a crucial role to play in promoting social justice in housing. As a discipline recognizing how social determinants impact an individual’s well-being and functioning, psychology must address the psychological factors contributing to housing inequality’s persistence. For example, psychology has studied how social categorization and power dynamics, as the social identity theory explains, influence an individual’s attitudes and behaviours toward different social groups (Hornung et al., 2019). This understanding provides insight into how discriminatory practices towards marginalized communities, such as BAME groups, are fundamentally linked to systems of privilege and power.
Through their expertise, psychologists can advocate for housing policies and practices that promote fairness and challenge discriminatory norms. Community psychologists have been instrumental in creating and evaluating interventions to promote equitable housing practices, mitigate discrimination, and address social determinants of health (Edyburn et al., 2023). Furthermore, research conducted by psychologists on the impact of housing inequality on health and well-being can inform policy-making and encourage community leaders to address these issues comprehensively.
Addressing housing inequality requires addressing systemic factors like institutional racism and generation-long injustices. Understanding how these issues contribute to discrimination can help understand the problem. Addressing gentrification and urban development regulations can also help improve housing affordability and accessibility (Anacker, 2019). Community initiatives and policy reforms can provide solutions to housing inequalities. Social professionals can use community preparations for fast-changing trends like the gig economy to identify challenges and future benefits. We can work towards a more equitable housing system by focusing on these factors.
Evidence-based practices can combat social inequality in housing. The UK Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government has implemented initiatives like the Social Housing Green Paper and Affordable Homes Programme to address housing gaps by providing low-cost housing options and improving temporary inhabitants’ lifestyles (Smyth, 2019). Community-based initiatives and grassroots movements, like Shelter, are crucial in challenging housing inequality. Shelter advocates for homeless and inadequately housed individuals, providing legal advice, lobbying for policy changes, and campaigning for housing justice (Fitzpatrick et al., 2022). Volunteering with these organizations raises awareness and challenges societal attitudes toward housing inequality. Social justice addresses challenges in affordable housing and zoning policies, which promote unjust distribution. Enacting these laws often faces discrepancies due to resource shortages and lack of political power. Government intervention through community support can help eliminate these issues and bring justice to housing despite the challenges faced by individuals alone.
Housing inequality in the UK is a significant issue affecting individuals and communities. Despite the principle of social justice, neoliberal policies’ focus on individualism has hindered progress towards creating more equitable housing systems. Psychology’s focus on social determinants of health can help identify factors contributing to housing inequality and promote social justice. Evidence-based interventions, community-based initiatives, and personal actions can lead to more equitable housing systems. Psychologists should advocate for social justice in housing, shifting the discourse from an individualistic, neoliberal perspective to community solutions.
Anacker, K. B. (2019). Introduction: Housing affordability and affordable housing. International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(1), 1-16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19491247.2018.1560544
Bristow, A. (2021, August). Meeting the housing needs of BAME households in England: the role of the planning system. In Institute for Social Policy, Housing, Equalities Research. https://i-sphere. site. Hw. Ac. Uk/2021/08/23/role-of-planning-in-meeting-housing-needs-of-bame-households-in-england. https://i-sphere.site.hw.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2021/08/A.Bristow-Final-report.pdf
Cashin, S. (2021). White space, black hood: Opportunity hoarding and segregation in the age of inequality. Beacon Press. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=cuY9EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=The+roots+of+housing+inequality+in+the+United+Kingdom+lie+in+discriminatory+policies+such+
as+redlining+and+racial+covenants,+which+have+resulted+in+segregation+along+racial+and+economic+lines&ots=61wW8WOhTE&sig=
vhdu7F0pgIGftf7kLodCzUtjxC8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Chisumbe, S., Aigbavboa, C. O., Mwanaumo, E., & Thwala, W. D. (2024). International Context of Neoliberalism in Housing Development. In A Neoliberal Framework for Urban Housing Development in the Global South (pp. 81-106). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Clarkson-Hendrix, M., & Cyr, M. (2023). Employment, housing, poverty, and the disability community. Social Work Practice and Disability Communities: An Intersectional Anti-Oppressive Approach. https://rotel.pressbooks.pub/disabilitysocialwork/chapter/chapter-10-employment-housing-and-poverty/
Edyburn, K. L., Bertone, A., Raines, T. C., Hinton, T., Twyford, J., & Dowdy, E. (2023). Integrating intersectionality, social determinants of health, and healing: A new training framework for school-based mental health. School Psychology Review, 52(5), 563–585. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2372966X.2021.2024767
Fitzpatrick, S., Busch-Geertsema, V., Watts, B., Wood, J., Ahmad, M. T. H., & McIntyre, J. (2022). Ending Street Homelessness in Vanguard Cities Across the Globe: An International Comparative Study. https://i-sphere.site.hw.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2022/03/Final-Report-Ending-Street-Homelessness-in-Vanguard-Cities.pdf
Gilbert, P. (2023). Human Dignity and Social Justice. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KMGoEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=social+justice+is+characterised+by+the+principles+of+fairness+and+equality+and+strives+to+ensure+that+all+
individuals+have+equal+opportunities+to+reach+their+full+potential+and+live+a+life+of+dignity&ots=JwknMWZ90b&sig=tBGe-NXGOZZOXLzWDXr9-66ByiY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2019). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(2), 211-231. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11077-018-9340-6
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/978-1-83797-034-620241005/full/html
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02673037.2018.1442561
Kährik, A., & Pastak, I. (2023). Access to homeownership in decline—rising housing inequalities for young people in the neoliberal housing market of Tallinn. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 1149087. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsc.2023.1149087/full
Rojs, D. V., Hawlina, M., Gračner, B., & Ramšak, R. (2020). Review of the participatory and community-based approach in the housing cooperative sector. Participatory research and planning in practice, 91-106. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/22965/1/1007194.pdf#page=99
Rolnik, R. (2019). Urban warfare: Housing under the empire of finance. Verso Books. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mnCKDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=This+market-oriented+ideology+in+U.K+has+turned+housing+into+a+speculative+investment,+making+it+difficult+for+vulnerable+communities+to+access+housing+and+turning
+it+into+a+volatile+market+force+&ots=EioAtbaSzO&sig=Yd2pbbzAiCzH6JzzmmdCg648uTA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Smyth, S. (2019). Embedding financialization: a policy review of the English Affordable Homes Programme. Housing Studies, 34(1), 142–161.
Suel, E., Polak, J. W., Bennett, J. E., & Ezzati, M. (2019). Measuring social, environmental, and health inequalities using deep learning and street imagery. Scientific reports, 9(1), 6229. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-42036-w