In this reflective account, I will draw on Tuckman’s model of group development to reflect on the teamwork experience during the collaborative activity undertaken in Study Topic 3. This reflective account will utilize Tuckman’s acclaimed model of group development to analyze the trajectory of growth within the team I assembled to train for a seminal MMA fight. By mapping my team’s progression through Tuckman’s stages, spanning forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning, I extract insights into the intricacies of collaboration and evolution catalyzed through shared purpose. Distilled principles highlight foundational competencies for leadership, communication, harnessing diversity, and nurturing relationships to unlock synergistic potential within teams. Dr. Bruce W. Tuckman, 1938–2016, was a researcher and educational psychologist (Bonebright, 2010). Tuckman’s model proposes that groups develop through the five stages. It enables a seamless progression from one phase to the next by actively directing the procedure with rules that provide a framework, limitations, and checkpoints. I will structure my reflection around this model to evaluate my experience of team development during the activity.
At the outset, when our group first came together, we were tentative and polite as we got to know each other. Group work can be quite a daunting and frustrating experience (Howells et al., 2023). As Tuckman suggests, there needs to be more clarity about the scope of the task and how we would collaborate. Putting the team’s structure together is what happens during the first formation phase. Due to the urge to fit in and be accepted by the group, team members are reserved and avoid disagreement at all costs(Tuckman & Jensen, 1977). The embryonic phase of our team’s genesis, analogous to Tuckman’s ‘forming’ stage, was characterized by an abundance of zeal unmatched by adequate planning and foresight. My unilateral decisions drove the selection of specialists spanning pertinent disciplines: MMA strategy, striking, grappling, strength training, and physical therapy. Geographic distance allowed us to communicate only in terms of sharing contact information and did not lead to any qualitative or regular communication. Our immediacy with the role-related responsibilities took a more significant hold without due regard for the aspect of team-building. As a recruit in the role, I was carried over by role-related objectives and missed out on some basic tenets of how to create an effective team that includes clear roles, predefined objectives, and methods of communication.
This stage very quickly brought the team into a fast swirl downward into chaos and discord that Tuckman would classify as ‘storming’. In the storming stage, people start to push against the established boundaries (Tuckman, 1965). As deadlines approached, stress built around the slow integration of training regimens from site to site. My loosely defined schedules caused many overlapping periods and frustration on the part of the team members. Underneath very conflicted-looking surfaces, hushed doubts began to rise as to my competence both as a leader and an organizer. Beleaguered by criticism, I took refuge in the egoistic outlook of an independent athlete, needing support rather than collaboration. I had to probe deeply before the actual realization that victory depended upon the strength of the team, not any single athlete. As the team begins to move towards its goals, members realize that they can only achieve some of what their initial enthusiasm and aspirations presented.
The finding marked a period of more intense communication and structured development of expectations, almost parallel to Tuckman’s ‘norming’ phase. Team members are in the process of developing new methods for working and interacting with one another. It is no longer “one” teammate in command but rather shared leadership as the group becomes more cohesive (Runkel et al., 1971). I had to acknowledge my fault and directly ask for feedback on where I was failing as a leader and an organizer. In response to this open vulnerability, members readily agreed to travel at great personal expense in order to facilitate more centralized training sessions. The extreme appreciation for their sacrifices transformed previous assumptions. Emphasis on my dialogues highlighted flaws in my lone warrior mentality, emphasizing the human dimension of teamwork. New norms crystallized with candid discussion, equitable compromise, and relationships developed parallel to task execution. Things seem more natural when people get to comprehend one another’s work habits and ethics. There is a lot more clarity about duties and responsibilities, expectations are established, and cooperation flourishes.
Liberated from discord, the team channelled synergistic potential into executing complex preparations with remarkable symmetry. Trust in the competence and commitment of members permitted me to invest my energies in training. Tuckman’s model captures the fluid functionality of aligned teams during high-performing stages. During the performing stage, the team achieves a great deal of its objectives. Both the level of skill and the level of commitment to the team’s goal are strong (Cassidy, 2007). Previously, reluctant delegators became eager collaborators. Specialized expertise is integrated seamlessly into a holistic training curriculum, propelling athletic capacity to unprecedented peaks through sophisticated periodization. Our eventual victory glowed with the fruits of coordinated exertion rather than solitary athletic talent.
In the aftermath, lingering team camaraderie was sustained through a final gathering to acknowledge contributions, offer feedback, and extract lessons in alignment with Tuckman’s ‘adjourning’ phase notions. Beyond winning, the team environment nurtured perseverance and unlocked hidden potential. Insights into future leadership were discussed with an emphasis on applications that could be made in regard to foundational team building, normalized expectations, role interdependence, and nurturing relationships parallel to the task. Even as we take leave in an atmosphere of celebrations, we always aim to integrate these lessons into our respective paths by setting up a team charter that will govern us in our future efforts.
In conclusion, Tuckman’s model strongly resonates with the stages of development our team progressed through during the collaborative activity. Investing more in team building during formation could have enhanced coherence earlier on. Overall, working through the stages facilitated our growth into an effective team. This reflection has illuminated my strengths and areas to hone for future group work. Beyond skills, the human dimension proves pivotal in summoning our highest selves in service of shared ambitions. Vision rooted in reality allows teams to reach destinations that elude lone wolves fixated on talent rather than community. Hardships forge bonds impervious to fairweather friends.
Developing leadership skills is the single most effective approach to making a difference in an organization. An organization that selects excellent people, develops them into leaders, and nurtures them has almost endless potential. The two basic concepts that are often included in definitions of leadership are that it involves forging a future vision and that members of the group must be committed to working together to achieve shared objectives that will realize the leader’s vision (Rea, 2023). This essay analyses the leadership approaches adopted by Gavin, manager of a health and fitness club, as outlined in the provided case study. Gavin leads a team of assistant managers, fitness trainers, and studio instructors at a high-end fitness club attached to a hotel, golf course, and spa complex. The club caters to both external members and hotel guests. With high annual membership fees, the club is viewed as exclusive yet attracts diverse customers given its prime location. The case study outlines several aspects of Gavin’s hands-on, engaging leadership style. However, it also highlights potential issues relating to the lack of diversity within his team, the selective empowerment of favoured staff, the preferential allocation of responsibilities, and the recent loss of club members to a newly opened competitor. This analysis will assess both the strengths and weaknesses evident in Gavin’s leadership approaches. It will offer recommendations to foster more empowering, motivational, ethical, and adaptive leadership to better manage the evolving challenges faced by the club.
Gavin exhibits a hands-on, leading-by-example approach and is willing to undertake menial tasks like cleaning toilets and mopping floors to model diligence for his staff. His visibility and availability to club members also reflect aspects of servant leadership, emphasizing meeting service users’ needs. This helps build his popularity with members, as he regularly engages with them while they work out to gather insights to improve club experiences. However, Gavin does engage in the practice of appointing assistant managers who share a similar mindset to his, and he has followed the similarity route as opposed to the diversity route. This homosocial hiring has served to limit the diversity of views within his executive team. Gavin also engages in favouritism, posting his favourite staff to benefit from the most comfortable ‘cushy’ duties and roles. Being a transactional leader, Gavin needs to set critical targets, followed by rewarding targets that are fulfilled. However, this contingent reward approach risks demotivating those who feel they need help to obtain prime assignments. Gavin also grants fewer responsibilities to those who are poor performers, a reflection of passive-avoidant leadership tendencies.
Gavin exhibits some positive leadership qualities through his hands-on approach to leading by example. By carrying out jobs such as cleaning washrooms himself, Gavin is displaying hard work, dedication, and service to his employees. Leading from the front can increase commitment on the part of followers when leaders translate the values they espouse into action. His getting any form of work done certainly portrays a personality where no work is too small for him and embodies an iconic spirit of hard work and humility. More significantly, Gavin’s visibility in the press, media, and broadcasting must also reflect some of the elements of servant leadership, particularly in relation to the needs of the service recipients that the club serves. Gavin often avails himself of the gym, talking with members as they go about their workouts. From these conversations, Gavin picks up the issues and gets ideas for improving the club experience and enhancing member satisfaction. Such an availability and listening attitude towards customers significantly helps manage the provision of service within the club and ultimately leads to customer loyalty. This distinguishes Gavin’s managerial personality, which takes place especially with members and directly engages them, during which his reputation and popularity in the club’s base were established. This was seen in the case of how members respect him. His amiable relationships and amiable presence in the gym lend a positive aspect to the culture of the club. As recognized by transformational leaders, constructive relationships with followers of the collective can result in solid influence and results (O’Boyle et al., 2015).
However, some issues and challenges crop up in Gavin’s leadership approach as well, especially with regard to homogeneous hiring practices, selective empowerment, and transactional contingent reward styles. As per the case study, assistant managers hired by Gavin consistently share their views and come from the same background. While this ensures alignment of the leader with the people, it could further tighten the demographics of leadership instead of acting to expand it. This tendency is known as homosocial preferences, where the people one might hire end up looking like those currently in power. This parochial hiring philosophy can make a firm somewhat of a closed system, becoming insular in nature and void of the diversity of thinking or input that expands growth. (Bennis, 2007). Gavin’s propensity for empowering only certain trusted insiders is also worrying. Though he verbalizes his desire to delegate some of the leadership responsibilities to his assistants, this comes much more from his self-interest in keeping the burden off his back than any real investment in developing others. As the case indicates, Gavin knows who to trust and channels most of the critical responsibilities through this group. At the same time, it is this preferential treatment that develops jealousy and contempt among other personnel who are overlooked.
Furthermore, Gavin’s transactional leadership of a contingent reward type, set at a condition where the leader sets targets, and the attainment of those targets is rewarded by desired assignments, might ensure outcomes in the short run. However, it may demotivate anyone who realizes that they are not able to secure desirable tasks regardless of their efforts. This tendency towards avoidant passivity translates into an additional bias against lesser performers. These problems may be contributing factors in the club’s recent loss of members to a newer competitor described as having friendlier, happier, and more motivated staff. Resentment toward the management group and other staff members who profit from the prejudice may arise when workers believe they are not receiving fair treatment (Levin, 1992). Boosting staff morale, performance, and diversity appears crucial to turning around the club’s fortunes.
There are some recommendations for improving the team’s effectiveness. Gavin needs to take active steps to diversify his team and counter the current homogeneity. This should start with broadening recruitment efforts to reach more diverse candidate pools rather than just drawing from familiar networks. Setting diversity hiring targets or quotas for underrepresented groups helps drive change (Barak, 2017). Providing unconscious bias training for Gavin and other hiring managers would also raise awareness of potential biases hindering diversity. Within the club, Gavin should promote inclusion through diverse leadership teams, employee resource groups for underrepresented employees, and diversity-focused social events and training. Inclusive cultures where uniqueness is valued enable enhanced workgroup performance.
Motivational Strategies Gavin should adopt a more transformational leadership approach to inspire staff through an appealing vision of the club’s future and praise for achievements. Providing opportunities for staff participation in decision-making and process improvements would also increase engagement. Recognizing all employees equitably rather than just a privileged in-group would help create a fairer organizational justice culture. Allowing staff some autonomy over their work and freedom would additionally motivate them through empowerment. As for talent development, this would be possible only through staff development and retention via clear career progression pathways supported by mentoring and internal training opportunities. Employees in high-retention companies have a favourable work environment that motivates them to care about their jobs (Sundstrom et al., 1990). This demonstrates retention by revealing to the employees that they can develop within the club. Stay interviews could point to the retention drivers that need addressing more precisely, such as work-life balance policies or modernizing the workplace. Marking loyalty with reward programmes increases retention, showing employees that their time spent with the company is appreciated.
However, it would be good and successful leadership that ought to be reviewed; nevertheless, one may also learn from poor leadership. The latter serves as a good illustrative example of what should not be done in the process of leading. In essence, poor leadership can typically fall into two categories: unethical and ineffective (Kellerman, 2004). If a leader is not able to reach the desired results, it is for one of three reasons: either poor abilities, poorly worked-out strategies, or improperly implemented methods. Leaders who are not able to decide what is right and what is not are rated as unethical.
In conclusion, Gavin had a few positives, like modelling for staff and seeking insights from members. However, homogenous hiring led to weaknesses like preferential treatment and contingent-reward transactional leadership. The most important thing was that his non-diverse and selective empowerment was a source of resentment and limited innovation. With time, his tendency to overlook poorer performers restricted their growth, and losing members to another competitor club with more motivated staff highlighted the need for change. Diversity initiatives could have been supported by recruitment and inclusion training suggestions, combined with the motivational ways of transformational leadership, autonomy, and participation, along with improved development by means of career progression, learning opportunities, and loyalty rewards—all to help a business revitalize the performance of its staff. This case study reinforced the importance of inclusiveness, empowerment leadership, and motivated team cultures in fitness organizations that essentially rely on the passion and commitment of their workforce. As competition intensifies, it becomes increasingly vital for leadership to inspire an ever-more-diversified talent pool and ensure the possibility of each talent realizing their potential while ensuring development. Incorporating Gavin’s leadership approach into the suggestions provided would allow him to rekindle employee motivation and capability towards the continued success of the club. What has been learned from this analysis is a powerful reminder of how effective leadership is at the core of achieving the highest possible levels of staff and organizational performance amidst the relentless pace of change in the dynamic sport and fitness industry.
Barak, M. E. M. (2017). Managing diversity: Towards a globally inclusive workforce. Sage Publications.
Bennis, W. (2007). ‘The challenge of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue’, American Psychologist, 62, pp. 2–5.
Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1997). Reframing Organisations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bonebright, D. A. (2010). Forty years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 111–120.
Cassidy, K. (2007). ‘Tuckman revisited: proposing a new model of group development for practitioners’, Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 413.
Howells, K., Lusted, J., & Macdonald, I. (2023). ‘Study Topic 3: Effective Teamwork in Sport and Fitness’, pp. 6–13.
Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.
Levin, I. M. (1992). Facilitating quality improvement team performance: a developmental perspective. Total Quality Management, 3(3), 307–322.
O’Boyle, I., Murray, D., & Cummins, P. (eds.) (2015). Leadership in Sport. Abingdon: Routledge.
Rea, S. (2023). Unit 16: What is leadership? The Open University.
Runkel, P. J., Lawrence, M., Oldfield, S., Rider, M., & Clark, C. (1971). Stages of group development: an empirical test of Tuckman’s hypothesis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(2), 180–193.
Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120–133.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2(4), 419–427.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 65(6), 384–399.