Quantitative research is the everyday underpinning for nursing studies, being a solid method of analyzing the complications in the healthcare sector. This approach is not limited to only the evaluation of actions but is also essential to understanding healthcare’s complexities. In nursing practice, we mainly consider leadership rounding and its influence on patients’ satisfaction, thanks to the qualitative research that brings intangible data about the efficacy of interventions, which serve as the basis for building evidence-based decisions. In this essay, we will discuss the role of quantitative research in nursing. We will also look at the issue of leadership rounding and its implications in the context of patient satisfaction. By doing so, we will enumerate this research’s various aspects, including types of evidence produced, efforts for improvement, and an example of a quantitative research design.
Quantitative research produces statistical and empirical data that can be enumerated and factually proved, giving firm grounding to any observations, trends, and outcomes. Numerical studies in the area of leadership rounds have been successful in bringing out the link between patient satisfaction and the phenomenon itself. For quantitative data, several instruments, like surveys, questionnaires, and standardized assessment tools, are used to collect information on patient satisfaction levels before and after the initiative of leadership rounds by healthcare organizations.
Numbers and statistics have become an indispensable part of the leadership rounding process. Regression analysis, correlation studies, and T-tests may help discover a cause-and-effect relationship between leadership rounding practices and patient satisfaction scores (Lovrić et al., 2020). In addition, it brings into focus the items of patient care that are affected by leadership rounds, especially communication, answering the call lights, pain management, and the capacity to be responsive to the patients. By developing solid empirical data gained through the research process, quantitative research contributes to a broader knowledge of the mechanisms underlying leadership and how this affects the patient’s satisfaction with the healthcare provision.
Qualitative research is the foundation upon which the endeavours to enrich leadership roles regarding rounding are built. The research provides a rational justification to policymakers and decision-makers when this data is used to understand the effectiveness of leadership rounding intervention within healthcare organizations. Leaders and administrators in healthcare rely on quantitative data to initiate leadership rounding and deploy resources in the right way, which will be the primary emphasis of leadership rounding initiatives (Siedlecki, 2020). Secondly, a quantitative study points out different areas that may be improved by leadership practice rounding using the factors connected to a higher level of patient satisfaction. Therefore, using numeric features and finding out the slight difference between the number of effective rounds versus others can now allow healthcare institutions to tailor their protocol to the data collected as much as possible.
Furthermore, empirical findings supply the establishment of fundamental and standard procedures and help to ensure the performance of the best practices that will communicate the equal and working effectiveness of healthcare processes among different organizations. Accordingly, the development and implementation of the immediately ongoing research activities are the foundation for the leadership rounding agenda, which provides the base for the patient satisfaction initiatives in the quality improvement procedures.
A quantitative research design that can be a great model for analyzing the relationship between leadership round and patient satisfaction of leadership round and patient satisfaction is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Through this study, patients who visited the hospital were randomly split into two groups – the intervention group, which received leadership rounding, and the control group, which lacked it. Validated patient satisfaction surveys, such as the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems), can be given to both groups. This questionnaire can be administered at various times of their hospital stay: on admission, in the middle, and at the point of discharge. The questionnaire contains many questions about patient satisfaction, including how well they communicate with the healthcare provider, the patient needs to be addressed promptly by personnel, and the quality of patient care experience.
Using statistical studies such as ANOVA and chi-squared tests, we can then analyze satisfaction and compare the intervention and control groups while controlling for occasion confounding variables, including, for example, age, gender, facility, health conditions, and so on. One possibility is that a leadership round might help decide the effectiveness factors, like whether a whole leadership round is competent, depending on patient acuity and unit type. Moreover, using qualitative research, nurses and healthcare workers can present concrete results of the impact of rounding on patient comfort and become part of the base of practical data in nursing and healthcare, which is even more helpful in making decisions.
Quantitative research is a unique and essential instrument in nursing practice that provides a straightforward way to describe, understand, and clarify the often complex issues in healthcare and assess interventions. Quantitative research, which studies leadership rounds and patient satisfaction, is a boon for nursing interventions. The results can be used to support evidence-based decision-making and may lead to policy developments within healthcare organizations. Quantitative research studies not only support but also enable the exploration of the path behind why leaders are more loved and the impact it has on patient satisfaction. As an influential participant in the healthcare system via evidence-based practice based on the findings of quantitative research and by so doing, attempts to change patient outcomes and advance the quality of care, thus the profession of nursing itself and, in the long run, the organizations.
Lovrić, R., Farčić, N., Mikšić, Š., & Včev, A. (2020). Studying During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Inductive Content Analysis of Nursing Students’ Perceptions and Experiences. Education Sciences, 10(7), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070188
Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. Research Gate. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
Tappen, R. M. (2016). Advanced Nursing Research: from Theory to Practice (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.