In nursing, the safety of patients is a function of the quality of communication, especially in transitions like the initiation of a duty shift. As described above, such processes represent core elements of outstanding healthcare unity and workflow simplification. However, this disappointing facet of marginal communication during staff shifts has been a looming danger to patient safety and the delivery of quality healthcare (Chen & Gong, 2022). This paper aims to shed light on this interconnected problem as we explore a new dimension, address its depth, and suggest workable solutions. Thoroughly scanning accomplished works and leveraging ideas from different sources grants an insightful view of the problem.
The ramifications of ineffective communication during nursing shift changes go beyond immediate patient results. As Ahn et al. (2021) state in their article, it leads to excessive healthcare costs and disrupted care coordination. As such, this paper’s main objective is to lend fresh views into nursing dialogue by suggesting reliable views for the difficulties between communication and this critical time. The single phrase “The Participation of Patient Safety Boosting Effective Communication and Exchange of Information during Nursing Change of Shifts” denotes the main idea, as it is about the leadership of complex communication challenges in healthcare settings and the implementation of viable solutions. This undertaking aims to give clinical healthcare workers the essential skills to facilitate the formation, nurture, and improvement of an effective communication culture during the nursing transition, which enhances patient safety and the quality of care.
In nursing, a lack of effective communication, combined with the absence of necessary information exchange during nursing shift changes, is one of the critical issues requiring research. The issue greatly influences the patients’ lives, both the care quality and the general efficiency of a health system’s delivery (Shore et al., 2022). When we look at the multifaceted impacts of this problem, its solution is vital. Undesirable situations, like mistakes in drug administration and delays in treatments, are the number one threat to patient safety. If not appropriately tackled, these problems diminish patients’ welfare, lengthen hospital stays, and incur higher costs for the healthcare system. Unlike previous hospitals, which utilized manual methods for shift reports, electronic handover of information emerged as a critical tool in the effective communication of patient care. They experience increased stress, burnout and decreased job satisfaction due to ineffective communication.
To solve nursing shift changes and issues of ineffective communication, the overarching goal is to foster patient safety, more coordinated care, and better healthcare delivery. This study’s primary objective is to identify the causes and get conventional answers related to the capstone project through this study. By conducting a critically thoughtful survey of the literature and obtaining a wide range of knowledge from the sources outlined in this plan, the aim is to develop a comprehensive grasp of the challenges emanating from ineffective communication throughout this important period. Meanwhile, the ultimate purpose is to provide the readers with step-by-step instructions on how to implement the decided changes in healthcare settings to tackle the issues that have been identified.
This problem of research is highlighted by its considerable implications on the quality of life of patients and the job satisfaction of healthcare professionals. It considers the complex scenario of nursing shift change and the fact that the project continues to uncover communication problems. The research will use evidence-based knowledge suggestions and practical tools to achieve this goal. Its purpose is to educate and provide healthcare organizations with knowledge and tools for effective communication, enabling them to set up an efficient culture (Thakral et al., 2024). In the long run, the focus should be on creating an environment that supports clinical safety and health care workers’ coordination of work and is patient-centred. This paper consolidates the outcomes from previous research projects and synthesizes them into a single research question that investigates the issue of ineffective communication during the nurse shift change, which will help to better comprehend the root cause of the problem across the healthcare delivery system.
The project will conduct a literature review to determine what part of the findings of the previous studies can be used to assess the association between communication and information exchange ineffectiveness during nursing shift changes and compare their results. Credible literature will be obtained from academic databases, including Google Scholar, Pro Quest, CINAHL, and Pub Med, to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic. Through this search process, articles are chosen based on the review undertaken by scholars and a topic related to the academic environment. Moreover, most of these tools give search results filtering options, which facilitates finding the required information quickly. The project will utilize the following search keywords, terms, and phrases: “handoff communication in nursing,” “ineffectiveness of communication in shift changes,” the bad thing that is evocated by “patient safety and handoffs in nursing shift,” which leads to “reporting errors in nursing shift.”
For the project to retrieve and show specific and relevant search results, Boolean operators like “AND,” “OR”, and “NOT” will be utilized to join the names and form the full search phrases. Searches that might include terms such as “nursing handoff communication AND patient safety”, “inefficient communication OR vital information are missing in nursing shift changes,” or “nursing shift report errors NOT medication errors” will be conducted. Only the literature fulfilling CRAAP criteria will be considered. Sources whose age is less than five years will be considered for inclusion, and this will ensure that the newest and most relevant research is mentioned. Besides that, the source materials used in the study must be proven relevant to the study setting, written by the individuals or institutions with the required expertise, accurate and precise in their information, and with a clear message.
Pursuing effective communication and exchanging information during the nursing shift changes were the main tools behind the research, which encountered varied evidence from different research levels and methods. The review uncovered different systematic reviews and meta-analytical reports, which are at the top of the evidence hierarchy in human medicine research. This comprehensive summarization of the current studies provides invaluable insights into the general concept of communication difficulties that are always associated with sign-out during nursing hours (Keenan et al., 2019). An opposite situation to this is when systematic reviews analyze several primary studies to give a more detailed appreciation and understanding of healthcare workers’ communication features that help them to be effective when exchanging information during each shift change.
The research was divided into a plethora of Randomized Control Trials (RCTs), which were carried out to evaluate the interventions that enhanced communication effectiveness during nursing shift changes (Teli et al., 2023). RCTs are usually accepted as the ultimate reference for clinical research, providing irrefutable evidence regarding the effectiveness of some treatments or techniques. In these studies, researchers use specific techniques, such as randomization and control group designs, to eliminate any bias and prove the cause-effect relationships between interventions and results. RCT results provide evidence that can be used to provide information about which strategy in use may help resolve communication problems during handover and protect patients from errors such as miscommunication between nurses during shift changes.
The review also looked at cohort studies and qualitative research, the results of which shed more light on inadequate communication during nursing shift handovers. Cultural studies offer psychological insights into the effects of communication habits on patients’ conditions throughout the period, enabling the determination of the connection between the cause and troubled factors. However, qualitative research aims to discover healthcare professionals’ situations and how they view communication’s interactive difficulties. Observations and interviews through community meetings and focus groups help to appreciate the factors ranging from poor communication to individual differences that may affect this process, especially in the health sector (Sibounheuang et al., 2020). The synthesized evidence through different levels leads to a firm understanding of the multifaceted nature of communication challenges during nursing shift changes, and they help devise evidence-based interventions and strategies for effective improvement.
The recent research by Mullan et al. (2019) highlighted the communication barriers that play a role in effective communication and missing info exchange among nursing shift changes. The authors came up with interruptions, inconsistency of the processes, and inadequate training as the main issues that could be improved for the organization to become an efficient communicator. Furthermore, along with environmental aspects such as noisy and distractive conditions in the healthcare settings, their negative impact on the quality of information exchanges during the change of shifts was also revealed. The research highlighted overcoming these barriers by conveying standardized methods, optimal training and strategies to deter ecosystem disruption. These elements are vital for seamless information exchange during the handoff process so that the nursing personnel can focus on improving the patient’s health and reducing medical errors.
According to Starmer et al. (2019), it is revealed that the lack of clear communication during patient handoffs has a grave effect. The researchers discovered a major relationship between inadequate communication and the high likelihood of a generation of medical mistakes, casualties, and prolonged hospital stays. The research confirmed a vital point involving communication effectiveness, which is providing the right information and care to the patient. In addition, the authors emphasized that the initiation of programs aimed at advancing methods of communication when handoffs are being passed will be necessary to prevent the occurrence of adverse outcomes. Through the handling of communication gaps and implementing standardized handoff protocols, healthcare agencies can reduce the likelihood of medical errors, increase patient safety, and potentially reduce discharges that could be unnecessary; therefore, healthcare quality and efficiency would improve.
The research paper by Müller et al. (2019) concentrates on applying the ISBAR (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) handoff tool in a healthcare setting. The results showed that using ISBAR improved the quality of information transfer during nurses’ work shifts. Finally, although staff members expressed more optimism with this tool’s use during handoff communication, they needed some adjustment to get used to this new change. As mentioned by the authors, ISBAR’s ability to facilitate more streamlined communication, convey the details of critical patient information, and improve the practice of organized and structured handoff during the transition of nursing care is a good example. By implementing the ISBAR procedure, the standard communication tool, healthcare institutions can achieve two crucial things: the accuracy and efficiency of the information exchange, which goes hand in hand with safe and quality care provision.
Smeulers et al. (2020) have highlighted the significance of developing communication training programs for nursing staff to address communication difficulties during shift change. The authors further emphasized the necessity of training for crises, which should craft medical staff to communicate well, handle distractions and interruptions, and foster a culture of open communication within the healthcare profession. Good communication training can allow nurses to share vital patient information accurately and in a well-defined manner during shift or work handoffs. Moreover, such training can create a transparent atmosphere where participants communicate, listen actively and respect one another; all these are the building blocks for seamless patient information exchange and reduce discontinuity of care. Healthcare organizations can achieve this by setting aside a budget to educate their nursing staff on all the communication training programs and the techniques and tools needed to overcome communication difficulties, hence improving the ratio of incidence of patient safety.
A study by Jiang et al. (2021) portrayed that technology-based solutions are suitable in nurse shift handoffs to improve their quality. The research project started with the introduction of an electronic handoff tool, which enabled clinicians to increase the completeness and accuracy of information exchange during shift transitions. The tool also proved to help reduce the time used in handoffs, a factor that could lead to higher productivity and efficiency. The case study specifically addressed the importance of implementing technology to automatize messaging activities across the organization and to run standardized patient data transfers. Electronic handover tools afford healthcare workers an organized and structured media to be used in writing and sharing start-up patient information, making the chances of incorrect information the lowest. By implementing these technology-driven solutions, healthcare institutions can provide better and quicker communication during a nursing staff handover, which will contribute to the quality of patient care and its safety.
As outlined in the literature review, several prospective solutions arose that should deal with the problem of ineffective communication and exchange of missing information during a nursing shift switch. One aspect that can be applied at the implementation stage is the employment of a standardized communication system, process, or protocol such as the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) or ISBAR (Identity, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), that helps in reducing the communication errors. Muller et al. (2019) concluded that nurse handoffs became much more standardized and complete when the ISBAR tool was applied. The scientific study found that nurses who were now positive about the handoff process improved the quality of communication. Additionally, a study conducted by the research team of Bigham et al. in 2020 showed that the SBAR tool effectively reduced missed information and improved patient safety. The establishment of structured and organized frameworks of communication with standardization can transcend smooth and consistent handoffs during shift changes and deliver essential patient data.
In addition, having frequent conduction of wide communication training for nursing employees is one solution to the problem. According to Smulers et al. (2020), it is essential that the training formulates solutions, enables participants to master communication techniques, concentration and organization and stresses a culture of collaboration and openness. This type of training can support nurses in developing the requisite skills for handling communication skills barriers they face while listening actively, talking and exchanging information clearly during handoffs. Financial support for the training of communication practice can enable healthcare entities to equip nurses to communicate efficaciously, enhancing safety and quality of care.
The lack of established effective communication and efficient two-way information exchanges during nursing shift changes increases the occurrence of errors and patient safety risks. They explored the literature, which indicated the different factors, such as communication problems, poor process standardization and weak training, that have led to these problems. Issues like medical errors, adverse events and inadequate care of patients are only a few of the consequences of communication failure and play a highlighting role in addressing the issue.
Multiple options are suggested, like creating standard means of communication with instructions and implementing a training program on communication for nursing staff. Tools like ISBAR have contributed towards the realization of relevant goals by improving the quality and completeness of transferred information. This also enhances the safety of the patients and induces staff satisfaction during the handover procedure (Müller et al., 2019). Furthermore, the training can incorporate nursing skills that help nurses cross barriers, cope with interruptions, and develop an environment that encourages open communication and collaboration.
Effective communication should be the first on the list of healthcare organizations’ priorities to avoid a negative impact on patients’ well-being and improve positive patient care outcomes. The use of evidence-based practices in daily work, like standardized communication tools and comprehensive training programs, alongside technology-linked solutions, allows healthcare organizations to achieve the safe and efficient transfer of patient data, significantly decreasing the risks of making diagnostic and treatment errors, which contributes towards patient care and safety (Jiang et al., 2021).
Ahn, J. W., Jang, H. Y., & Son, Y. J. (2021). Critical care nurses’ communication challenges during handovers: A systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(4), 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13207
Chen, Y., & Gong, Y. (2022). Teamwork and patient safety in intensive care units: challenges and opportunities. Studies in health technology and informatics, 290, 469. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220120
Jiang, C., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y., & Wen, Y. (2021). Implementation of an electronic handoff tool to improve nursing handoff quality. International Journal of Medical Informatics, p. 146, 104347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104347
Keenan, G. M., Yakel, E., Tschannen, D., & Mandeville, M. (2019). Putting handover communication into practice: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 34(2), 116-122.
Mullan, P. C., Macias, C. G., Hsu, D., Minichiello, T., & Doty, B. (2019). Identifying barriers and facilitators to handoffs at the time of ED admission to the inpatient floor for critically ill children. Pediatric Emergency Care, 35(8), 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001517
Müller, M., Jürgens, J., Redaèlli, M., Klingberg, K., Hautz, W. E., & Stock, S. (2019). Impact of the communication tool ISBAR on nursing shift changes: A mixed-method quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 81, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.005
Shore, C. B., Maben, J., Mold, F., Winkley, K., Cook, A., & Stenner, K. (2022). Delegation of medication administration from registered nurses to non-registered support workers in community care settings: A systematic review with critical interpretive synthesis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 126, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104121
Sibounheuang, P., Olson, P. S., & Kittiboonyakun, P. (2020). Patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives on diabetes management: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(7), 854–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.001
Smeulers, M., Vergoossens, B., Peremans, L., Cohen, J., Penders, Y. W. H., & Nijs, S. (2020). Communication skills training for nursing students: An analysis of discrepancies between ending competencies and nurses’ perceptions. Nurse Education in Practice, 43, 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102714
Starmer, A. J., Parikh, K., Campbell, A., Simon, D., Wong, J., Srivastava, R., … & Landrigan, C. P. (2019). Preventability of pediatric medication errors in hospitalized children. Pediatrics, 143(6), e20183192. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3192
Teli, M., Thato, R., Hasan, F., & Rias, Y. A. (2023). Effectiveness of Family-Based Diabetes Management Intervention on Glycated Haemoglobin Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biological Research For Nursing, 10998004231218887. https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004231218887
Thakral, P., Sharma, D., & Ghosh, K. (2024). Evidence-based knowledge management: a topic modelling analysis of research on knowledge management and analytics. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/VJIKMS-03-2023-0079/full/html