On the international level, the climate change fight is centered on the following three objectives. Mitigation goal involves reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases by seeking to cut down their release in the atmosphere and consequently reduce the global temperature hikes (Wright, P.457). Put another way, the objective of these initiatives is to keep the rise in temperatures to not more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels with more developed expectations of even 1.5 degrees Celsius. Mitigation is unquestionably crucial for preventing the worst climate change ramifications, such as the hazards caused by extreme weather events, impacts on ecosystems, and threats to the push of water and food security.
Second, adequate mechanisms for adaptation to climate change are pivotal to international climate action. The protection against some extent of inevitable climate change is the aim of the adaptation measures, that is, increasing resilience and mitigating damages related to the impact of climate change (Wright, P.459). This means learning to cope with new climate scenarios, expected, e.g., alterations in precipitation patterns, shifts in extreme weather events, increased erosion processes, and others. By committing to adaptation measures, communities and nations can be more resilient to not only losses of infrastructure but also damage to the livelihood of individuals as well as the ecosystem.
Furthermore, finance and technology transfer seem to form the base for the international strategy in the world’s efforts against climate change. This goal, then, underscores the need to observe the procedure of financial support by delivering financial assistance and technology transfer from developed to developing nations to both cope with the consequences of climate change and fight against climate change. Sustainable development without such support can thus be quite challenging and could delay or hinder the development/implementation of necessary green practices, making developing nations more prone to shocks and unable to transition into a low-carbon economy (Wright, P.460). While facilitating the allocation and utilization of fair financial resources and advanced study and technology, international cooperation can be the fastest way to overcome the global climate change problem.
In order to fulfill these objectives, international efforts began by establishing treaties and protocols like the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. The Copa de Kyoto 1997 became the first document to set binding reduction targets for developed countries. Undoubtedly, this was a highlight on the way to cooperation among countries in tackling climate change. On the other hand, the 2015 Paris Agreement introduced a more malleable format; each country is responsible for defining its quota of emissions it must reduce- Nationally determined contributions (NDCs). This transformation promoted greater inclusivity and engagement initially, with the capability of different states to deal with climate change being recognized without prejudiced discrimination based on their circumstances. In addition, strategic endeavors such as the Green Climate Fund have been set up to provide the main rationale of fund financing to poor countries, whereby they can attempt to reduce emissions and hopefully mitigate the impacts of global warming.
These bilateral and Multinational agreements and initiatives illustrate to a great degree the ability of the world powers to coordinate and totalize the efforts of the world’s fight against climate change. While the Kyoto Protocol dictated the country’s approaches toward reducing emissions by setting relatively firm targets, Kyoto is dead. The Paris Agreement has taken a more inclusive and flexible approach to the problem, which leads to the recognition of the rising need for the countries to cooperate in their efforts but do this within their capacities. Aside from this, the Green Climate Fund is one of the measures that shows the desire of developed states to alleviate the main financial problem for developing countries, providing the necessary wherewithal to tackle climate change worldwide (Wright, P.462). By providing cooperation, accountability, and management assistance, these efforts seek to contribute to the global mission to mitigate climate change and increase resilience to its consequences in a timely manner.
Although economic interests, political goodwill, and equity issues pose obstacles to realizing climate objectives, these can be resolved through educational campaigns, awareness, and national and international commitment. Industries mainly based on fossil fuels do not usually support the regulation of their emission, but economic reasons make it in favor of the industry owners being afraid of the loss of profits and competitiveness. Moreover, the absence of political spirit and collaboration at the international level leads to the infirmity of agreements due to differences in objectives and interests of various countries. Moreover, equity issues emerge in the process, as developing countries petition for a fair apportionment of commitments that hold that developing countries, whose emissions account for a smaller percentage of the atmosphere, nonetheless bear the main burden of the climate change responsibilities, which is due to historical impacts of climate change in developed countries (Wright, P.463). Such differences of opinion are usually the reason behind the standstills of the talks, making it more complex to rein in the endless climate change talks and even more challenging to implement the necessary climate action globally.
In a nutshell, the proposed comprehensive plan combines technology, diplomacy, and economic methods to provide scholarships to fight the problems of greenhouse gas emissions reduction and the advancement of worldwide climate goals. By allocating resources to environmentally friendly technologies like solar, wind, and carbon utilization technologies, the plan aims to eliminate the dependency on crude oil and reduce the pollutants. Also, creating peaceful coexistence through diplomatic dialogue among nations blurs the political boundaries, providing a way to make the agreements more effective. Besides this, economic incentives, like carbon pricing instruments and compensation for renewable energy technologies, take market and environmental protection objectives head-on. By successfully applying these approaches, the strategy aims to surpass difficulties in global work on a sustainable and resilient future during climate change.
Wright, Richard T. Environmental science. Galgotia Publications, 1974.